Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz

Share this post

Big Pharma & Dataphobia

maajidnawaz.substack.com

Big Pharma & Dataphobia

Who paid the largest criminal fine in history? - #JustLookItUp

Maajid Nawaz
Jan 25, 2022
20
Share this post

Big Pharma & Dataphobia

maajidnawaz.substack.com

The Radical Dispatch

This is the free version of the Radical dispatch. To listen to my accompanying Resistance Radio broadcast please become a paid subscriber here:

Share

Big Pharma & Dataphobia

Who paid the largest criminal fine in history? - #JustLookItUp

1) The BMJ and Big Pharma

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has launched a scathing attack against big pharmaceuticals on the issue of their opaque Covid vaccine data. The BMJ editorial team are demanding access to the data, and they are demanding it now.

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
The British Medical Journal attacks Big Pharma & demands covid VACCINE DATA “Big pharma is the least trusted industry. At least three of the many companies making covid-19 vaccines have past criminal & civil settlements costing them billions of dollars..” bmj.com/content/376/bm…
Image
9:06 PM ∙ Jan 23, 2022
6,425Likes2,895Retweets

The editorial really is worth reading in full, though here are some key extracts:

Serious remarks made by the BMJ team above about big pharmaceutical companies having been found criminally culpable for their past actions are easily verifiable. In case you’re wondering who paid the largest criminal fine in history - #JustLookItUp on your own browser:

2) Why Pfizer may suffer dataphobia

The latest BMJ intervention comes after their previous editorial slamming in particular Pfizer’s lack of data transparency around their vaccine:

Twitter avatar for @bmj_latest
The BMJ @bmj_latest
NEW: Our latest investigation hears from a whistleblower engaged in Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial. Her evidence raises serious questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight
ow.lyCovid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trialRevelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open lette…
1:44 PM ∙ Nov 2, 2021
29,002Likes19,250Retweets

Again, the article is worth reading in full. It contains allegations on how Pfizer “falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported”. Here is an extract:

For those who enjoy primary sources, here is the full document dump for the above Pfizer leak:

The DisInformation Chronicle
Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Whistleblower's Documents Released
A few weeks back The BMJ published my investigation of documents provided by whistleblower Brook Jackson regarding data integrity issues in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial, “Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial…
Read more
a year ago · 34 likes · 7 comments · Paul D. Thacker

None of this is too inspiring for those who are being forced (at risk of losing their livelihoods) to take this vaccine, not once, not twice, but repeatedly through boosters.

The silver lining here is that the BMJ will soon partially get its way. In fact, the editorial team may well have known this already. We are all expecting 55,000 pages of specifically Pfizer data documents to be released per month. Yes, that is correct: 55,000 pages per month. The below court decision pre-dated the above BMJ demand that vaccine data be released now. US Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents a plaintiff in this case, recently provided a stunning update via his own Substack, Injecting Freedom:

Injecting Freedom
Instead of FDA’s Requested 500 Pages Per Month, Court Orders FDA to Produce Pfizer Covid-19 Data at Rate of 55,000 Pages Per Month!
On behalf of a client, my firm requested that the FDA produce all the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine. The FDA asked the Court for permission to only be required to produce at a rate of 500 pages per month, which would have taken over 75 years to produce all the documents…
Read more
a year ago · 961 likes · 444 comments · Aaron Siri

The full court decision is here, with a concluding extract provided below:

The BMJ appears to not be jumping on any bandwagon here. The journal has long been sceptical of Big Pharma motives. Here they are in 2018 - pre-Covid - calling out government contracts and big pharmaceutical business models:

“Government funding for health innovation is subsidising drug industry profits while providing little public health benefit”

And such concerns are certainly not unfounded. The violation tracker records that since the year 2000, Pfizer US appears to have been charged 75 times for civil and criminal violations having paid a total of $10,193,896,333 in fines. From the offence groups, the top two categories for these fines has been “safety related offences” and “healthcare related offences.” The top primary offence type in the top offence group was “drug or medical equipment safety violation”. Here are the relevant extracts:

This is clearly not about your health. It never has been. It is all profiteering. Big Pharma is big business. This is why you witness competing pharmaceutical companies fight over the spoils, just like any large corporate would. The London Times reports:

So if their track record speaks for itself and if the corruption is known, why is the BMJ and everyone else for that matter seemingly unable to acquire Pfizer’s vaccine data? Why did it require a court judgement and what is behind the Federal Drug Authority’s (FDA) reticence to release? Perhaps this Guardian article might help to explain things. Our government agreed a secrecy clause in its vaccine contract with Pfizer:

3) The consequence of their silence

Of course, a consequence of big pharmaceutical silence on the data is that we appear to have all been sold a drug based on false marketing. Here is the Pfizer CEO over a year ago telling us what we were all assured by our governments the vaccine would do:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
CEO of Pfizer Every lie will be revealed You are all on RECORD We Are Coming.
Image
Twitter avatar for @AlbertBourla
Albert Bourla @AlbertBourla
Excited to share that updated analysis from our Phase 3 study with BioNTech also showed that our COVID-19 vaccine was 100% effective in preventing #COVID19 cases in South Africa. 100%! https://t.co/E2ksTJSopU
12:51 AM ∙ Dec 28, 2021
4,473Likes1,616Retweets

And here is what the vaccine appears to have done instead:

“the current Omicron outbreak is largely an epidemic of the vaccinated and is being driven, not by the unvaccinated, but by those who have been double and triple jabbed”

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
BREAKING: “the current Omicron outbreak is largely an EPIDEMIC of the VACCINATED & is being driven, not by the unvaccinated, but by those who have been DOUBLE & TRIPLE JABBED” dailysceptic.org/2021/12/22/tri… (data from @ONS) We have been trying to RAISE the ALARM (see my thread below)
Image
Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
What we do know already, backed up by much academic research, is that MASS-VACCINATION DURING A PANDEMIC, with a jab that has not been studied for long-term side effects, could be doing more harm than good. From SAGE minutes: https://t.co/sydso6QhhP
11:29 AM ∙ Dec 23, 2021
1,972Likes1,001Retweets

If only this stopped though at apparently dud vaccines. Sadly, when looking at deaths there is a particular concern. The Telegraph reports:

“Daily reported Covid death figures are too high because people are dying from conditions unrelated to the virus after testing positive” UK Health Secretary Sajid Javid admitted

If Covid deaths attributable to no other cause have been vastly over-reported in the UK, and if according to the Office for National Statistics the grand total of those who died solely due to Covid is 17,371 (as explained in previous editions of the Radical Dispatch and Resistance Radio - Lies, Damn Lies and the House of Cards) then what explains the observable spike in UK all-cause mortality? The London Times reports:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
We have been trying to WARN you, there’s a SPIKE in UNEXPLAINED deaths. Link to today’s Times: thetimes.co.uk/article/5cb0ee…
Image
Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
THREAD: “Thousands more people than usual are dying ... but it’s not from Covid” “The COVID-19 (lockdown) RESPONSE may have inadvertently CREATED AN ONGOING HEALTH CRISIS from which there is NO WAY BACK” #LockdownsKill #RESIST https://t.co/LIf6yrlmyc
3:10 PM ∙ Nov 25, 2021
1,237Likes608Retweets

And again, The London Times:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
“Health experts have been left baffled by a big rise in a common & potentially fatal type of heart attack in the west of Scotland..there was a 25% rise in the number of people rushed to..Hospital..with partially blocked arteries cutting blood supply”
thetimes.co.ukMystery rise in heart attacks from blocked arteriesHealth experts have been left baffled by a big rise in a common and potentially fatal type of heart attack in the west of Scotland.During the summer there was a 25 per cent rise in the number of people rushed to the Golden Jubilee National Hospital in Clydebank with partially blocked arteries cuttin
5:48 PM ∙ Sep 30, 2021
663Likes379Retweets

Professors Norman Fenton and Martin Neil of Queen Mary’s University of London (QMUL) have an explanation for these observable excess deaths:

“the evidence indicates a spike in all cause mortality shortly after the vaccination”

Here is my interview with Professor Fenton about his latest research on this topic:

No, that was not a mistake. Censorious and conflicted youtube took the interview down. So here it is again on youtube. The interview is very alarming, and is worth a listen in full:

They have very clearly taken the view that vaccines are what’s causing this observable spike in all-cause mortality. Such a conclusion is by no means unique to Professors Fenton and Neil. The BMJ had previously published (this hyperlink takes you to the archived copy), and then subsequently removed without explanation, a doctor who raised the very same alarm:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
Dr Polyakova, the Medical Director of a hospital in Kent, claimed in the BMJ that mass-vaccination is leading to sickness This letter was removed from the BMJ for “misinformation” here: bmj.com/content/372/bm… Readers complained about its removal here: bmj.com/content/372/bm…
Image
Image
Image
7:12 PM ∙ Dec 26, 2021
1,015Likes634Retweets

But it has been a year since that shameful BMJ debacle, and by now more doctors are beginning to speak out, making this debate impossible to ignore. Here is orthopaedic surgeon Ahmad Malik on why he's against compulsory Covid vaccines for NHS staff:

“There is data showing that people are dying, having serious side effects from this. It isn’t well established. It is experimental. The phase-3 trials run until 2023 and we are now forcing individuals to give up their bodily autonomy and take this vaccine. And if we’re now gong to go down this route where we say, ok, let’s override bodily autonomy in the interest of others, where does that lead us? Because that’s opening a really dangerous Pandora’s box and why not have compulsory organ donations? You’ve got two healthy kidneys, you don’t need two, why not give one away? Where does it end?”

Twitter avatar for @GBNEWS
GB News @GBNEWS
'On one hand, we've got mandates and on the other hand, we've got personal freedom, bodily autonomy, and informed consent. If you think you can have both, you're gravely mistaken.' Orthopaedic surgeon Ahmad Malik on why he's against compulsory Covid vaccines for NHS staff.
11:30 AM ∙ Jan 22, 2022
1,778Likes656Retweets

Another doctor, Dr Steve James - even famously confronted Health Secretary Sajid Javid on live television about why he wished to remain unvaccinated:

"We've seen three relatively young, healthy people come into King's College Hospital post-vaccination, who've died".

Twitter avatar for @unherd
UnHerd @unherd
"We've seen three relatively young, healthy people come into King's College Hospital post-vaccination, who've died". Dr Steve James on how his personal experience affected his vaccine choice 👉 unherd.com/thepost/dr-ste…
4:51 PM ∙ Jan 12, 2022
854Likes400Retweets

And of course, consultant cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra has long been raising the alarm with us:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
PFIZER SCANDAL Consultant Cardiologist @DrAseemMalhotra attacks Pfizer for the “falsified data” covid vax scandal “I had the vaccine..under the belief, which has now been proven FALSE, that I was going to protect patients from getting the virus from me”
Twitter avatar for @bmj_latest
The BMJ @bmj_latest
NEW: Our latest investigation hears from a whistleblower engaged in Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial. Her evidence raises serious questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight https://t.co/Ho99hQhwRM
4:39 PM ∙ Nov 6, 2021
9,028Likes5,656Retweets

Beyond the UK, international evidence is also beginning to emerge:

Twitter avatar for @Covid19Crusher
Covid19Crusher @Covid19Crusher
Smart epidemiological Japanese study evidences a causal link between vaccination and the abnormal following deaths. And therefore the mendacity of the many health authorities denying it. npojip.org/english/MedChe… (p.32)
Image
10:01 AM ∙ Dec 14, 2021
1,135Likes621Retweets

And of course, we have long known that this could be why:

Twitter avatar for @Telegraph
The Telegraph @Telegraph
💉Teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems from the vaccine than be hospitalised from Covid-19, a major study has found telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/0…
telegraph.co.ukTeenage boys more at risk from vaccines than CovidYoung males are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems after being jabbed than be hospitalised from coronavirus, study finds
6:23 PM ∙ Sep 9, 2021
19,290Likes13,148Retweets

Indeed, the UK government has started to admit as much itself, on it’s own website:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
UK government ADMITS myocarditis link after vaccine. They are in retreat We Are Coming. “myocarditis - significant left ventricular fibrosis has been described in a high percentage of children..no follow-up data is available yet on hospitalised patients” gov.uk/government/pub…
Image
Twitter avatar for @LBC
LBC @LBC
'This is as absurd as mandating nuts in every meal.' @MaajidNawaz hits out at those who have 'abandoned their critical thinking faculties' when it comes to Covid mandates. https://t.co/UHBzTN9KAV
2:53 PM ∙ Dec 2, 2021
5,279Likes3,071Retweets

4) The devil is in the detail

If it is really this bad, how on earth did big pharmaceutical companies think they could get away with it in the age of mass-communication? Perhaps because our politicians once again used an emergency to change our law in order to make it difficult for us to hold anyone responsible for their greed.

“November 2020: changes to permit limited advertising in certain types of public health emergency, reflecting the Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 (section 5.2)” as per below and found here:

Twitter avatar for @MaajidNawaz
Maajid أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz
This is how they THINK they got away with it The law on labelling was CHANGED. It used to be prohibited to make unproven clinical claims. Advertising was strictly CONTROLLED. They changed this under the GUISE of a public health emergency (see 2nd image) assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Image
Image
3:43 PM ∙ Dec 28, 2021
507Likes251Retweets

Such changes to legislation is easy if you have the money to hire 22 lobbying firms (yes, that is 22 lobbying firms in DC) and can lobby both sides of the political aisle:

Twitter avatar for @LegendaryEnergy
An0maly @LegendaryEnergy
Guess who they lobby? Both parties!
Image
Image
Twitter avatar for @JordanSchachtel
Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com @JordanSchachtel
Pfizer has now hired 22 separate lobbying firms, all in Washington, DC, to craft drug policy in the United States. Yes, that's the accurate #. TWENTY TWO lobbying firms. Tons of top Congressional staffers & fmr WH officials have been recruited to push Pfizer's agenda in DC.
4:28 PM ∙ Oct 3, 2021
346Likes155Retweets

Perhaps such lobbying can also pressure government to attempt to criminalise those who question Big Pharma.

As The London Times reports:

“Government sources gave the example of antivaxers spreading false information”

We will know soon enough once the data is released. The above though, is already concerning enough.

5) A special place in hell

Finally, after reading this, it is difficult not to concede that a special place in hell is reserved for people such as this California Senator Scott Wiener (Dem) who is attempting to lower the age of vaccine consent for children from age 18 to 12. I have preserved his tweet here incase it is deleted.

Twitter avatar for @Scott_Wiener
Senator Scott Wiener @Scott_Wiener
🧵 I introduced new legislation (#SB866) to lower the vaccine age of consent from 18 to 12. Unvaccinated teens are at risk, put others at risk & make schools less safe. They often can’t work, participate in sports, or go to friends’ homes. Let’s let teens protect their health.
4:17 PM ∙ Jan 21, 2022
655Likes97Retweets

We must never let that happen, anywhere, for anyone.

Thank you for reading Radical - by Maajid Nawaz. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Share this post

Big Pharma & Dataphobia

maajidnawaz.substack.com
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Maajid Nawaz
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing