Big Pharma & Dataphobia
Big Pharma & Dataphobia
Who paid the largest criminal fine in history? - #JustLookItUp
The Radical Dispatch
This is the free version of the Radical dispatch. To listen to my accompanying Resistance Radio broadcast please become a paid subscriber here:
Big Pharma & Dataphobia
Who paid the largest criminal fine in history? - #JustLookItUp
1) The BMJ and Big Pharma
The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has launched a scathing attack against big pharmaceuticals on the issue of their opaque Covid vaccine data. The BMJ editorial team are demanding access to the data, and they are demanding it now.
The editorial really is worth reading in full, though here are some key extracts:
Serious remarks made by the BMJ team above about big pharmaceutical companies having been found criminally culpable for their past actions are easily verifiable. In case you’re wondering who paid the largest criminal fine in history - #JustLookItUp on your own browser:
2) Why Pfizer may suffer dataphobia
The latest BMJ intervention comes after their previous editorial slamming in particular Pfizer’s lack of data transparency around their vaccine:
Again, the article is worth reading in full. It contains allegations on how Pfizer “falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported”. Here is an extract:
For those who enjoy primary sources, here is the full document dump for the above Pfizer leak:
None of this is too inspiring for those who are being forced (at risk of losing their livelihoods) to take this vaccine, not once, not twice, but repeatedly through boosters.
The silver lining here is that the BMJ will soon partially get its way. In fact, the editorial team may well have known this already. We are all expecting 55,000 pages of specifically Pfizer data documents to be released per month. Yes, that is correct: 55,000 pages per month. The below court decision pre-dated the above BMJ demand that vaccine data be released now. US Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents a plaintiff in this case, recently provided a stunning update via his own Substack, Injecting Freedom:
The full court decision is here, with a concluding extract provided below:
The BMJ appears to not be jumping on any bandwagon here. The journal has long been sceptical of Big Pharma motives. Here they are in 2018 - pre-Covid - calling out government contracts and big pharmaceutical business models:
“Government funding for health innovation is subsidising drug industry profits while providing little public health benefit”
And such concerns are certainly not unfounded. The violation tracker records that since the year 2000, Pfizer US appears to have been charged 75 times for civil and criminal violations having paid a total of $10,193,896,333 in fines. From the offence groups, the top two categories for these fines has been “safety related offences” and “healthcare related offences.” The top primary offence type in the top offence group was “drug or medical equipment safety violation”. Here are the relevant extracts:
This is clearly not about your health. It never has been. It is all profiteering. Big Pharma is big business. This is why you witness competing pharmaceutical companies fight over the spoils, just like any large corporate would. The London Times reports:
So if their track record speaks for itself and if the corruption is known, why is the BMJ and everyone else for that matter seemingly unable to acquire Pfizer’s vaccine data? Why did it require a court judgement and what is behind the Federal Drug Authority’s (FDA) reticence to release? Perhaps this Guardian article might help to explain things. Our government agreed a secrecy clause in its vaccine contract with Pfizer:
3) The consequence of their silence
Of course, a consequence of big pharmaceutical silence on the data is that we appear to have all been sold a drug based on false marketing. Here is the Pfizer CEO over a year ago telling us what we were all assured by our governments the vaccine would do:
And here is what the vaccine appears to have done instead:
“the current Omicron outbreak is largely an epidemic of the vaccinated and is being driven, not by the unvaccinated, but by those who have been double and triple jabbed”
If only this stopped though at apparently dud vaccines. Sadly, when looking at deaths there is a particular concern. The Telegraph reports:
“Daily reported Covid death figures are too high because people are dying from conditions unrelated to the virus after testing positive” UK Health Secretary Sajid Javid admitted
If Covid deaths attributable to no other cause have been vastly over-reported in the UK, and if according to the Office for National Statistics the grand total of those who died solely due to Covid is 17,371 (as explained in previous editions of the Radical Dispatch and Resistance Radio - Lies, Damn Lies and the House of Cards) then what explains the observable spike in UK all-cause mortality? The London Times reports:
“the evidence indicates a spike in all cause mortality shortly after the vaccination”
Here is my interview with Professor Fenton about his latest research on this topic:
No, that was not a mistake. Censorious and conflicted youtube took the interview down. So here it is again on youtube. The interview is very alarming, and is worth a listen in full:
They have very clearly taken the view that vaccines are what’s causing this observable spike in all-cause mortality. Such a conclusion is by no means unique to Professors Fenton and Neil. The BMJ had previously published (this hyperlink takes you to the archived copy), and then subsequently removed without explanation, a doctor who raised the very same alarm:
But it has been a year since that shameful BMJ debacle, and by now more doctors are beginning to speak out, making this debate impossible to ignore. Here is orthopaedic surgeon Ahmad Malik on why he's against compulsory Covid vaccines for NHS staff:
“There is data showing that people are dying, having serious side effects from this. It isn’t well established. It is experimental. The phase-3 trials run until 2023 and we are now forcing individuals to give up their bodily autonomy and take this vaccine. And if we’re now gong to go down this route where we say, ok, let’s override bodily autonomy in the interest of others, where does that lead us? Because that’s opening a really dangerous Pandora’s box and why not have compulsory organ donations? You’ve got two healthy kidneys, you don’t need two, why not give one away? Where does it end?”
Another doctor, Dr Steve James - even famously confronted Health Secretary Sajid Javid on live television about why he wished to remain unvaccinated:
"We've seen three relatively young, healthy people come into King's College Hospital post-vaccination, who've died".
And of course, consultant cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra has long been raising the alarm with us:
Beyond the UK, international evidence is also beginning to emerge:
And of course, we have long known that this could be why:
Indeed, the UK government has started to admit as much itself, on it’s own website:
4) The devil is in the detail
If it is really this bad, how on earth did big pharmaceutical companies think they could get away with it in the age of mass-communication? Perhaps because our politicians once again used an emergency to change our law in order to make it difficult for us to hold anyone responsible for their greed.
“November 2020: changes to permit limited advertising in certain types of public health emergency, reflecting the Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 (section 5.2)” as per below and found here:
Such changes to legislation is easy if you have the money to hire 22 lobbying firms (yes, that is 22 lobbying firms in DC) and can lobby both sides of the political aisle:
Perhaps such lobbying can also pressure government to attempt to criminalise those who question Big Pharma.
“Government sources gave the example of antivaxers spreading false information”
We will know soon enough once the data is released. The above though, is already concerning enough.
5) A special place in hell
Finally, after reading this, it is difficult not to concede that a special place in hell is reserved for people such as this California Senator Scott Wiener (Dem) who is attempting to lower the age of vaccine consent for children from age 18 to 12. I have preserved his tweet here incase it is deleted.
We must never let that happen, anywhere, for anyone.
