This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.
At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 10th February 2026, with a transcript provided - Epstein Files Fallout: Name All the Clients.
This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:
Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.
Epstein Files Fallout: Name All the Clients
- A Radical Dispatch
1) Names Revealed in the UK
We appear to have shifted to a new timeline.
As last week’s Radical Dispatch laid out, two princes - the former Prince Andrew and the ‘Prince of Darkness’ Lord Mandelson - were revealed in the Epstein Files to have acted as British conduits for the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s global blackmail trafficking operation at the behest of Mossad, it seems.
Whereas the ramifications of this story continue to reverberate across the world, triggering resignations and outings everywhere, it remains important to recall that none of what we have yet seen can be described as justice, in a legal sense.
Ghislaine Maxwell remains the only woman to have been mysteriously convicted for sexually trafficking underage victims to absolutely nobody.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “Ghislaine Maxwell remains, as of yet, the only woman convicted for trafficking underage victims to absolutely nobody. And that is the fundamental conundrum in the case of the Epstein files. And that is that other than Prince Andrew having been stripped of his title, and Mandelson having to have had to quit the House of Lords and his position in the Labour Party, it doesn’t appear - in the way of punishments - for anyone to have faced anything that could even be described as being close to justice. Keep in mind, and as we’re going to go into in the details of this stream, resignations and public shamings and loss of titles, considering the scale and the implications of the crimes we are talking about, cannot in any way be defined as justice. If we’re discussing, as it appears increasingly to be the case, the international globalist trafficking ring that was trafficking in underage victims for the purposes of acquiring compromise on politicians to sell out the national interests of on behalf of a foreign power, presumably most likely to be Mossad, then we’re talking of not just treason here, we’re also talking, of course, of the crime of underage rape and trafficking, but including, as we’re about to hear in this stream, torture, rape, and so on and so forth. So considering the sheer scale and enormity of the crimes, a resignation here and a stripping of a title there doesn’t feel anywhere near close to justice, especially for those who may have fallen victim to this scheme. So that is the topic for today. Epstein Files Fallout: Name the Clients.”
Justice did at least appear to be introducing itself at the home of the former advisor to three British Prime Minister’s and former UK ambassador to Washington DC, Epstein-friend and Prince of Darkness, Lord Peter Mandelson.
The Telegraph reports 7th February 2026:
The police seemed keen on letting us all know that they’d been calling.
Considering what is being revealed, it is understandable.
New York Post reports 10th February 2026:
And it wasn’t just men involved, either. Though some of the potential lines of inquiry are now quite literally, dead.
“…Annabelle Neilson appears numerous times in the latest tranche of documents relating to disgraced financier Epstein, released by the US Department of Justice on Friday. Neilson, who died at the age of 49 in 2018, was a prominent model in the 1990s and 2000s and was a fixture of the London party scene..”
Upon learning of the sheer scale and horror of these organised globalist criminals, many among the British public were demanding the harshest possible punishments.
So serious is the situation, that PM Starmer’s government has started to crumble. The resignation of PM Starmer’s No.10 Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney provided the first blow.
The problem for Starmer was that Mandelson-protege McSweeney had been trained by Mandelson on the Labour party’s highly-restricted Excalibur database, which kept files of Kompromat on every single Labour MP.
The Times reports 13th September 2025:
“In this pursuit, McSweeney had no closer ally than Mandelson. The pair had first met in the late 1990s when McSweeney was a volunteer at party headquarters and worked on Excalibur, a database pioneered by Mandelson…and privately helping McSweeney to go harder, and faster, in expunging the left. After the election victory last year, he awaited his reward. Ever since the New Labour days, Mandelson had felt overlooked and undervalued. In government, he never came near to occupying a great office of state. McSweeney would remedy this perceived injustice.”
Using the ‘Excalibur’ database, McSweeney became Mandelson’s - and hence Epstein’s - enforcer inside the Labour party, and then inside the British government.
The Halstead Gazette reports 8th February 2026:
“Reports suggest he was later hired to work in Labour’s ‘attack and rebuttal unit’ in the party’s Millbank headquarters, where he is said to have been tasked with adding information to Peter Mandelson’s ‘excalibur’ database which informed campaign messaging.”
This is how Mandelson was revealed to have built up an entire network of presumably compromised globalist Labour MPs, whom he could commandeer with complete obedience to takeover the Labour party, and the British government.
Meanwhile, any journalist who tried to reveal such matters was subjected to ‘opposition research’ with their lives being potentially ruined by Mandelson’s network.
Conversely, those with kompromat on them would be promoted by Mandelson, because it was they who would be easier to control once they were in positions of power, at risk of their secrets being exposed.
This is precisely why we called Labour an institutionally pedophile party.
Click to play:
"But we're taking the Labour Party's phrase and we're now turning it back on them and calling the Labour Party 'institutionally pedophilic'. Why? Because this isn't about every single member of the Labour Party being a paedophile. This is about a system being put in place that ensured that those with paedophilic or otherwise compromising sexual information acquired on them, it ensured that because of the database named Excalibur that Prime Minister Starmer's former Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeny was trained on by Mandelson, because of that database, the Labour Party - structurally - unfairly promoted and chose those who are loyal to people like Mandelson and hence Epstein in that Babylonian, Tower of Babel, paedophilic system that they erected for control over the Labour Party."
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED.
By yesterday, it appears that our message had been signed by the Tories.
Click to play:
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch: “Nobody buys it, Mr. Speaker. Not even the Labour women, because they know he always puts the Downing Street Boys Club first. And how dare he criticise us? We weren’t the ones stuffing government with hypocrites and pedophile apologists. He can’t build a team, Mr. Speaker. He has no plan. He can’t even run his own office, let alone the country. He is now dealing with a new scandal of appointing someone who campaigned for a man convicted of having indecent pictures of girls as young as 10. Isn’t the Prime Minister ashamed that that will be his legacy?”
PM Starmer: “Mr Speaker, my legacy is changing my party and winning a general election. And I’ll tell you this, I kicked my former leader out of my party. Her former leader, Liz Truss, broke the economy and has descended into bonkers conspiracy theories. I kicked her out of Parliament. She’s too weak to kick her out of their party.”
Badenoch: “Mr. Speaker, he hasn’t apologized for appointing Matthew Doyle because he won’t take responsibility. He never does, and they know it. The prime minister is now telling everyone that he’s never lost a fight. It’s because he won’t step into the room. He’s never lost a fight. He’s walked away from welfare reform. He won’t stand up to the unions. He won’t stand up to China. He can’t even stand up to Mauritius. He’s had, Mr. Speaker, he’s had three cabinet secretaries, four chiefs of staff, five director of communications in just 18 months. And now he is mired in yet another scandal. Does he ever look in the mirror and ask himself, is the real problem staring him in the face?”
And that same message was sealed by the Liberal Democrats.
Click to play:
Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey: “To appoint one paedophile supporter cannot be excused as misfortune, to appoint two shows a catastrophic lack of judgment. The Right Honourable Gentleman once told this House that when a Prime Minister refuses to take responsibility, and I quote, ‘it only serves to convince people that things cannot get better, that governments cannot improve people’s lives, and that progress is not possible because politics does not work’. Does he still agree with himself? And does he share my fear? That is exactly what is happening now.”
PM Starmer: “People in this country, millions of people, have been let down for years and years and years. And one of the reasons was austerity, which his party supported. He should take accountability and take responsibility for what he has inflicted on this country.”
And the same message again was delivered by the independents.
Sometimes in quite harsh terms.
Understandably, the doorsteps are furious.
In such a climate, Starmer’s Director of Communications also had no choice but to resign.
Followed today by his Cabinet Secretary.
As matters have now embroiling the King of England.
New York Post reports 10th February 2026:
Over the shenanigans of his brother, the former Prince Andrew.
The Telegraph reports 12th February 2026:
And the names kept coming.
As people were scrambling to react.
The Telegraph reports 9th February 2026:
Incase they too were named.
As more and more scandals began erupting in the press.
Daily Mail reports 8th February 2026:
“Following his departure from the MHRA, Hudson was awarded an OBE in the 2020 New Years Honours in recognition of his leadership and work on healthcare regulation and medicines oversight. Hudson later worked for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as its Senior Advisor, Regulatory Affairs, Integrated Development, Global Health until 2024.”
Yes, this is how they controlled the Covid-mandate narrative too.
As the Radical Dispatch has been stating for a long while, the purpose of said blackmail operation was revealed to be serving the global military-technocracy complex owned by Peter Thiel’s private Ai-military targeting software company, Palantir.
The purpose of this globalist blackmail operation is to coerce obedience to further technocracy through permawar.
While Palantir seemed intent on acting oblivious to the rising scandal.
The Times reports 10th February 2026:
“The latest files released by the US Department of Justice relating to Jeffrey Epstein show that (Palantir founder, Peter) Thiel arranged to meet the convicted sex offender several times between 2014 and 2017. This was after Epstein had been jailed for soliciting a person under the age of 18 for prostitution in 2008.”
Thankfully, the Tories finally understood our message.
The Daily Mail reports 8th February 2026:
“The Prime Minister and Lord Mandelson, who at the time was Britain’s ambassador to the US, visited Palantir’s offices in Washington DC in February 2025. Lord Mandelson brokered the meeting between Sir Keir and the firm, ahead of Palantir winning a £240million data analytics contract with the Ministry of Defence. Downing Street has refused to say if Sir Keir knew at the time of his visit to Palantir’s offices whether Palantir was a client of Global Counsel. Global Counsel was co-founded by Lord Mandelson and has worked with a roster of clients including Palantir, GSK, Vodafone, OpenAI, TikTok and the Premier League. The lobbying firm recently announced it had cut ties with Lord Mandelson in the wake of fresh revelations about the peer’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. Newly-released documents in the US, known as the ‘Epstein files’, have revealed further details about Lord Mandelson’s relationship with the paedophile financier. Peter Thiel, a co-founder of Palantir, is also named in the material released by the US Department of Justice and has acknowledged meeting Epstein ‘a few times’.”
And Starmer began facing serious questions about Peter Thiel’s Palantir.
Everything that Mandelson negotiated while serving as our ambassador to Washington DC will now become a matter of public domain, after being scrutinised by parliament’s intelligence and security committee.
The Times reports 6th February 2026:
“They added that despite having oversight of the intelligence agencies the ISC had ‘never before had access’ to the kind of sensitive operational information they will now receive, which includes the entirety of the UK’s government strategy to deal with the Trump administration”
Recognising how serious matters had gotten, Starmer sought to put a line under it all by apologising.
Click to play:
PM Starmer: “I want to be clear no one is above accountability. And no one, however well connected, however experienced, how a senior should hold public office if they cannot meet the basic test of honesty. I also want to address the publication of the information Mandelson provided during the appointment process. I understand the strength of public feeling. I share the anger that people feel when powerful individuals appear to escape scrutiny. And I want to be able to release those documents as quickly as possible. I wanted to release them yesterday, in fact, and to talk about them at Prime Minister’s questions. But the police have advised that releasing certain information now could risk prejudicing a future investigation or legal process. And however frustrating from my personal point of view that is, and it is, I will not take any step, however politically tempting, however popular, that risks justice for victims. Because this is not and must never become a political game. The victims of Epstein have lived with trauma that most of us can barely comprehend. And they’ve had to relive it again and again. They have seen accountability delayed and too often denied. I want to say this: I am sorry. Sorry for what was done to you. Sorry that so many people with power failed you. Sorry for having believed Mandelson’s lies and appointed him. And sorry that even now, you’re forced to watch this story unfold in public once again. But I also want to say this: in this country, we will not look away. We will not shrug our shoulders. And we will not allow the powerful to treat justice as optional. We will pursue the truth. We will uphold the integrity of public life. And we will do everything within our power and in the interests of justice to ensure accountability is delivered. That is what the public expects. That is what the victims deserve. And it is what I will do.”
The problem for Starmer is that everyone knows that he knew about Mandelson, and had been pre-warned.
The Independent reports 12th September 2025:
“Serious concerns have been raised that newly sacked US ambassador Peter Mandelson did not clear security vetting for the role – but the prime minister pushed through his appointment anyway. Sources have told The Independent that MI6 failed to clear the Labour peer…there were…worries that his past links to the disgraced financier and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein ‘would compromise him’.”
The former head of the SIS (formerly Mi6) Sir Richard Dearlove similarly waded in.
The Telegraph reports 5th February 2026:
Click to play:
Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of Mi6: “I wasn’t shocked because I think one knew enough about the man to know that there were so many skeletons in the cupboard. He shouldn’t ever have been put in any of these positions. After the first few incidents in his professional life, that should have discounted him out. I mean, he clearly was a person who couldn’t be properly vetted. And I think, look, if you’ve been the head of an organisation, which demands developed vetting for every single member of staff where you have a responsibility - and from a period of time in MI6, I was actually the head of personnel or the director of personnel - you demand of your staff the highest standards of behaviour and you don’t give them the benefit of the doubt when something goes wrong. And if their vetting certificates are withdrawn, they lose their jobs. It’s as simple as that. I was disgusted.”
But Starmer tried in vain to strike a defiant tone, stating with gumption that he would ‘never give up’.
Click to play:
PM Starmer: “I am their prime minister, and this is their government. And I will never give up on that fight. There are some people in recent days who say the Labour government should have a different fight, a fight with itself, instead of a fight for the millions of people who need us to fight for them. And I say to them, I will never walk away from the mandate I was given to change this country. I will never walk away from the people that I’m charged with fighting for. And I will never walk away from the country that I love. And that is the country who I truly believe we are, a compassionate, reasonable, live and let live country, a diverse country, where given half the chance, we’ll help each other out. That is who we are as a country, and I want to serve every single part of that country, the country that I love. But the fight coming up in politics, the real fight, is not in the Labour Party. It’s with the right-wing politics that challenges that, the politics of reform. The politics of divide, divide, divide. Grievance, grievance, grievance. That will tear our country apart. That is the fight that we are in. And I will be in that fight as long as I have breath in my body.”
All while Labour’s lobotomised MPs stood to attention clapping for Dear Leader like monkeys, as he refused to resign.
A window into establishment thinking on the seriousness of matters was provided by the Times of London, which published a Leader column also commenting on the need for something resembling justice to actually be delivered.
The Times reports 9th February 2026:
It seems that the shoe may soon be on the other foot.
The Telegraph reports 10th February 2026:
And while the globalist Labour party is being exposed for systemically preying on our young, soon the globalist Conservatives will be exposed too - lest we forget - for systemically preying on our elderly.
2) Names in the US
As in the UK, those who procured victims for Epstein had been women.
While the clients were usually men.
The Independent reports 10th February 2026:
The release of these latest files brought Congressional attention back to the former president Bill Clinton, who was finally forced to submit to a congressional hearing on the matter.
While all around him other powerful men were dropping like flies.
This included revelations about members of the current administration too.
And other key establishment figures such as the Clinton and Obama lawyer, Kathy Ruemmler.
Though the worst allegations did seem to hover over mainly male billionaires.
With Les Wexner’s involvement posing some new legal questions for FBI Director Kash Patel.
“While Wexner’s role in facilitating the crimes of Epstein has been well-established for years, the revelation that the FBI officially acknowledged him as a co-conspirator by 2019 dismantles the narrative woven by the Trump administration that it has not withheld the identities of any of the notorious pedophile’s accomplices. In September 2025, Patel ostensibly did just that when he testified before Congress regarding Epstein. During his testimony, Patel was asked “Who did Epstein traffic these young women to?” by Louisiana Senator John N. Kennedy. Patel responded, “Himself.” There is no credible information—none—that he trafficked to other individuals.” The revelation that the FBI had confirmed that Wexner was a co-conspirator of Epstein by 2019 suggests that Patel lied to Congress during his testimony. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, knowingly and willingly making a materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement to Congress is a felony punishable by a prison sentence of up to five years.”
Out of all the billionaires, Elon Musk seems to be the most animated.
But perhaps that’s because he has alot to distract from too.
Including revelations found in original emails posted on the DOJ website that Epstein brought three girls to see Musk for unknown reasons.
And the scandal didn’t just engulf the fields of politics and tech, but also the academy.
And culture.
And music.
And popular ‘spirituality’.
Most inconveniently for crypto-bros, even Bitcoin didn’t seem to escape Epstein’s designs.
3) President Trump
One of the most surprising turn of events for most liberal observers of this latest release of Epstein Files is how President Trump came out looking exonerated. Elon Musk had planted the seed a long time ago.
Trump had indeed been in the files, but not in the way that Musk was implying. Indeed, Trump was so horrified about what Epstein was up to that he called a police chief to thank him for investigating him.
Forbes Magazine reports 10th February 2026:
Even ABC News was forced to cover this story.
ABC News reports 10th February 2026:
But none of this prevented globalists from seeking to weaponise Epstein victims against Trump.
The plan is to try and make as much mud stick to Trump as possible.
3) Names in Europe
Fallout wasn’t just limited to the UK and US. Europe too had its fair share of scandal, starting with the Rothschild bank.
And Slovakia witnessed the resignation of their National Security Adviser.
While the World Economic Forum launched an investigation into its CEO.
But among all the countries particularly hit was Norway.
The Norwegian crown princess was revealed to have been a close friend of Epstein. This, while her own son was put on trial for rape.
A former Norwegian prime minister was also placed under investigation for his own ties to Epstein.
And Norwegian diplomats came under fire.
With a Norwegian ambassador having to resign.
With all of this going on in Norway, consider again Trump’s recent letter to the Norwegian PM stating his complaint about Norway having unfairly blocked him from receiving a Nobel peace prize.
Couple this Norway news with the below revelation about Epstein, Norway and the Nobel peace prize, and in retrospect Trump doesn’t seem quite so crazy any more does he?
4) International Names
India‘s prime minister Modi did not escape the shame, as emails revealed Epstein disclosing that he “danced and sang for Israel”.
The original email on Modi is found here on the DOJ website.
But no place took a harder hit this time around than the UAE.
Last week, we stated in the Radical Dispatch that the redacted person who sent the email stating “I loved the torture video” must be identified.
This week he was revealed to be….
…Become a premium subscriber to Radical Media to learn the identity of the torture email sender, and to access the WARRIOR CREED podcast and other paywalled privileges.
