This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.
At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 3rd February 2026, with a transcript provided - Epstein Files: The Prince & The Dark Prince Fall - PM Starmer is Next.
This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:
Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.
Epstein Files: The Prince & The Dark Prince Fall - PM Starmer is Next
- A Radical Dispatch
1) The Prince Falls
The latest Epstein file dump by the US Department of Justice has shocked the world. Two princes - the former Prince Andrew and the ‘Prince of Darkness’ Lord Mandelson - have been revealed to have acted as British conduits for the convicted global pedophile trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s blackmail operation.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) released more than three million pages from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation under the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed by President Trump.
Click to play:
“The categories of documents withheld include those permitted under the act to be withheld, files that contain personally identified information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files, and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardise an active federal investigation, and finally, anything that depicts or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced. Although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secret in the interest of national security or foreign policy, no files are being withheld or redacted on that basis. Further, as we previously stated in our December 19th letter of last year, the department withheld or redacted files covered by various privileges, as we always do, including deliberative process privilege, work product privilege, and attorney-client privilege. As you all know, under the act, the department must subsequently submit to the House and Senate committees on the judiciary a report listing all categories of records released and withheld, a summary of redactions made, including the legal basis for such redactions, and a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the act. We will do so in due course as required under the act.
I want to talk for just a moment about the redactions that will be obvious to anyone who reviews the materials that we just produced today. In addition to the documentary redactions, which includes personal identifying information, victim information, and other privileges, there is extensive redactions to images and videos. To protect victims, we redacted every woman depicted in any image or video with the exception of Ms. Maxwell. We did not redact images of any men unless it was impossible to redact the woman without also redacting the man. To this end, though, and to ensure transparency, if any member of Congress wishes to review any portions of the response of production in any unredacted form, they’re welcome to make arrangements with the department to do so, and we’re happy to do that.”
As the above states, some materials were withheld for common sense reasons such as victim privacy, or for suspects who remain under active criminal investigation.
Prince Andrew was targeted to influence the British aristocracy, or the right. And the ‘Prince of Darkness’ Lord Mandelson was targeted to influence commoners, or the left.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “Keir Starmer himself is cooperating with the police on Mandelson because it does appear to be the case that criminal offences were committed. Why is this topic so important? What we’re going to show is that, as we stated at the beginning, Lord Mandelson provided Epstein, acted for Epstein as the conduit between Epstein and British political circles. So the Prince of Darkness, or Dark Prince Mandelson, was Epstein’s conduit for the layman, or the House of Commons. And the Prince, or formerly known as Prince Andrew, was Epstein’s conduit for the upper echelons, or aristocracy. So that’s what it appears to be, the structure. And with that in mind, we’re going to demonstrate how Mandelson was communicating with Epstein over the course of at least three prime ministers, at least.”
Prince Andrew’s involvement with Epstein was already known. Nevertheless, newly released incredibly creepy images of Andrew kneeling over what appears to be an incapacitated woman still shocked the world.
As did exchanges between law enforcement officials detailing allegations of torture and murder against Prince Andrew.
This is an email chain within a US government personnel document. It is a report alleging that Ghislaine Maxwell sold a girl into sexual slavery and torture in the 90s, resulting in her death. Prince Andrew is named by the reporting individual as an accessory. The below email exchange is found at the US Department of Justice Epstein files library here.
Indeed torture seems to be a recurring theme in these files. The below email between Epstein and a redacted sender can be found on the DoJ website here.
So serious are matters now for the former prince, Andrew, that he may well need to submit to a full congressional inquiry.
BBC reports 31st January 2026:
“Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has suggested that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor should testify before the US Congress over his dealings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”
The damage is such that even the Clintons have been unable to continue refusing the demands of Congress after this latest Epstein release.
The Times reports 3rd February 2026:
“The former president Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary have agreed to testify in person before Congress as part of its investigation into the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. They gave an eleventh-hour offer to appear before the oversight committee after the House prepared to vote to hold them in contempt. The Clintons had for months refused to testify, describing the subpoena by the committee’s Republican chairman as ‘invalid and legally unenforceable’.”
As we already said…
Radical Media reports 20th November 2025:
2) The Dark Prince Falls
But we said there were two princes.
Aside from Prince Andrew, Lord Mandelson was known as the Prince of Darkness due to the power he maintained over successive Labour prime ministers.
Until recently, Mandelson had been serving as PM Starmer’s British ambassador to Washington DC.
Radical Media reports 12th September 2025:
That is until he was quite literally caught with his pants down.
The Daily Mail reports 1st February 2026:
Matters went downhill for Lord Mandelson from there. First, it was revealed that he has provided sensitive trade information to Epstein while serving as Business Secretary.
The Financial Times reports 2nd February 2026:
Then, revelations of money being exchanged solidified suggestions that something more sinister was at play.
The Daily Mirror reports 31st January 2026:
It turns out that Epstein even sent funds to Mandelson’s husband.
BBC reports 30th January 2026:
To make matters worse, these funds are speculated to be payment by Epstein to Mandelson for what appears to have been a rather compromising relationship with government secrets.
Sky News reporting 2nd February 2026:
The sheer weight of the scandal left corporate media no choice but to cover the story extensively.
Channel 4 News summarised details of Mandelson’s cash for access relationship with Epstein.
Click to play:
Channel 4 News Broadcast: “…seven months after installing Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States, Keir Starmer sacked him over his connections to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Today, as even more compromising messages between the two were revealed, Keir Starmer handed out still more punishment. ‘As the House knows, Peter Mandelson is no longer a member of the Labour Party, having resigned his membership last night and the House may wish to know that disciplinary action was underway by the Labour Party prior to his resignation. The Prime Minister believes, as does the government, that Peter Mandelson should not retain his membership of the House of Lords or use his title’.
‘For Ronaldo and me to be here, it’s literally a dream come true’. That last great job in government has turned into a nightmare. A special bill could now be rushed through Parliament to strip Peter Mandelson and future peers who fall into disrepute of their titles.
The leaks of inside information to Jeffrey Epstein carried on into the last hours of his ministerial career after the 2010 general election. Peter Mandelson tipped off Jeffrey Epstein that he’d persuaded Gordon Brown he didn’t have enough MPs to form a government. And he revealed to Jeffrey Epstein that a 500 billion euro bank bailout was about to be announced. Much contact had preceded that. In 2009, Peter Mandelson forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein an interesting note that’s gone to the Prime Minister. It contained market-sensitive information, which included a proposed asset sales plan. What saleable assets? Epstein asks. Land. Property, I guess. Mandelson responds. A few weeks later, a highly market-sensitive analysis of lending by the Prime Minister’s top city advisor was forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein almost the moment it arrived in the conduit’s inbox. The evidence suggests the sender with the redacted email was again Peter Mandelson. ‘Within four seconds of that reply, someone forwarded it to Jeffrey Epstein. Can’t see their name, they’re redacted. We can see the redacted name is the same length as Peter Mandelson’s redacted name. We can see it’s from a device with the same default signature and the same time setting. It’s incorrectly set to not British summertime, even though it was the summer. And those are characteristics of Peter Mandelson’s Blackberry’. In December, Peter Mandelson helps out with lobbying against the banker’s bonus tax, being brought in by Alastair Darling, then the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Epstein asks, ‘should Jamie’, Jamie Dimon, boss of J.P. Morgan, a bank Epstein worked with, ‘call Darling one more time?’ Mandelson replies, ‘yes, and mildly threaten’. The advice was followed, and the threat to scrap a London HQ plan was made when Jamie Dimon called Alistair Darling a few days later, as recommended by Alistair Darling’s fellow cabinet minister. ‘I’m shocked. I mean, I’ve never heard anything like it before. It seems extraordinary behaviour. It’s breaching confidences. It’s breaching trust. It’s letting down your colleagues. I mean, it is a great betrayal.’
A few months later, when Peter Mandelson is forwarded detailed minutes of a meeting between Chancellor Alastair Darling and US government advisor Larry Summers on banking reform, he pings them off to Jeffrey Epstein, begging what becomes a bit of a catchphrase, please protect. Epstein then appears to make detailed drafting suggestions on financial services legislation. ‘I mean, I did see it. I mean, I don’t think I’ve got the vocabulary to describe how shocking it is, the bleaches of confidence that were taking place. Alastair Darling certainly had no idea that this was happening’.
Within a few weeks, Jeffrey Epstein began payments to Peter Mandelson’s partner, Ronaldo da Silva, now his husband. $4,000 a month, which appears to have continued for three months. When I go to the pub, I buy my friends beers and they buy me beers. And there was never a signed agreement to buy beers in exchange for each other. We never even discussed that I’ll buy you a beer and you’ll buy me a beer. But it’s clearly socially accepted. It’s how pubs work. I think it was socially accepted between Mr. Epstein and the people he corresponded with, including Peter Mandelson, that you got something for something, and that access went one way and money went the other way. And that’s what we’re seeing happening here. The Epstein files suggest $75,000 had been paid over a few years earlier. Lord Mandelson said in a weekend statement he didn’t recall such payments. The insider tip-offs would be bad enough to any outside contact, but Peter Mandelson’s old friend, Jeffrey Epstein, had only recently been convicted of procuring a child for prostitution. The co-architect of New Labour has said in previous statements he regretted taking Jeffrey Epstein at his word. As more and more contacts emerge today, there were no words from Lord Mandelson.”
By the end of that day, the man who had facilitated the rise of at least three Labour prime ministers had no choice but to resign the party whip.
By the next day, he had also resigned from the House of Lords.
By now, his friends were rushing to abandon him live on television.
Sky News reports 1st February 2026:
Click to play:
Trevor Phillips for Sky News: “Welcome to Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips. Peter Mandelson and I met for the first time almost exactly 50 years ago, on a march protesting against apartheid. It’s no secret here in Westminster that over the following three decades he and I worked together, first as student activists, then as television journalists, and as elected politicians. He’s appeared more than once on this programme. We were, and are still, friends. His political career was long and illustrious. Mine was brief and disastrous. It’s a friend’s privilege to tell you that you are ill-suited to a role, even that you are a complete idiot. 20 years ago, Peter was honest enough to make it clear to me that my lack of tact and distaste for compromise meant that I’d be better suited to journalism than party politics.
I have not spoken personally to Lord Mandelson about the release this weekend of documents, messages, photographs and videos related to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He was invited to join us this morning, but declined. However, he has told this program that neither he nor his husband, Rinaldo Avila da Silva, has any record or recollection of receiving payments in 2003 and 2004, or knows whether the documentation is authentic. He does accept that Ronaldo received a loan of $10,000 from Epstein, whilst he, Mandelson, was a senior cabinet minister. And he acknowledges that in the same period, Epstein was amongst those who lobbied him on important policy matters. There’s no suggestion that Lord Mandelson has done anything unlawful. But I would claim the friend’s privilege to tell Peter that he has been, at best, naive and foolish, at worst, greedy and duplicitous. Whatever is true, as far as politics and public office are concerned, for Peter Mandelson, this is the end. The question now is whether the price of his misjudgment is to be paid only by the man himself, or whether those who trusted him and elevated him to the peerage and to one of the highest diplomatic posts available, should also share in his ignominy.”
And the corporate media that had so recklessly backed him was now also rushing to ditch him.
Even where Mandelson had once only enjoyed defence and deference, such as at Global’s LBC..
He was now being ruthlessly turned on.
Click to play:
Emly Maitlis: “People around Keir Starmer who were saying, we know about Mandelson’s relationship to Epstein. Bad idea, Keir. It’s a bad idea, Keir. And for reasons that we still do not fully understand, Keir Starmer felt able to ignore those voices around him and appointed him as ambassador. And the stuff that’s coming out now, the stuff that you’ve pointed to, Lewis, which is about influencing tax policy Because you have been asked to by billionaires from whom you have received money. He says he has no recollection. In fact, he says he’s going to investigate himself. He’s going to start an investigation by me to see if he was paid by Epstein or not. Fine. But the fact that all that was coming from somebody at the heart of Downing Street, it’s worse than just being a friend of a dodgy guy. Just briefly, bear in mind, of course, that when those emails are being sent, that is around the time and just after the time that Epstein had received his conviction. He was staying in Epstein’s flat. He was literally living in Epstein’s house in New York whilst Epstein was in an open prison on charges of child prostitution.”
Albeit somewhat hypocritically.
Other MPs, notably from the Reform party, began calling for Mandelson’s criminal investigation.
Click to Play:
Robert Jenrick MP: “Peter Mandelson to our premier ambassadorship was always a grotesque error of judgment by the prime minister given everything that we knew about this man. And now we’re told that this man leaked confidential information to a convicted sex offender when he was a cabinet minister and took tens of thousands of pounds in secret backhanders. It is a total disgrace. Is the minister really coming to the House today to say that he neither intends to bring forward primary legislation to deal with this now, but will write to the House of Lords and seek their support to modernise their procedures in months’ time, and nor...Will he go proactively to the police and demand an investigation when Peter Mandelson has clearly broken the law and stands now accused of serious misconduct in a public office and should be tried for his offences?”
The former chairman of Reform went further, stating that he must go to jail.
Reform party leader Nigel Farage demanded a Europe-wide fraud investigation.
As he tied Mandelson’s behaviour to a breach in national security.
Click to play:
Reform Party leader Nigel Farage: “I also wonder weather in emails to Epstein he talked about the security apparatus that exists underneath Number 10 and at the heart of Whitehall that is information that is of national security importance, and so I think there is reason to ask the question whether Mandelson has not broken the official secrets act. I’d like to know whether Lord Hermer would be happy and satisfied for a prosecution to proceed on that basis. I think it’s that serious.”
Here is the email Farage is referring to, where Mandelson reveals to Epstein that No.10 Downing Street is connected to the Ministry of Defence via an underground tunnel.
Considering Mandelson’s use of code in emails to avoid detection, in the end the police had no choice but to review materials with a view to a criminal investigation
And due to the nature of the criminal allegations being made, Starmer had no choice but to cooperate, handing all material over to the police.
The government was then forced to publish all information related to Mandelson’s vetting prior to being appointed ambassador.
Everything will soon be public.
Not even one MP objected.
But it is not over for Mandelson yet. This is just the beginning of the Dark Prince’s downfall.
3) Epstein, Mandelson & Three UK Prime Ministers
The reason matters are so serious is because, through Mandelson, the scandal spans the course of at least three British Labour prime ministers: Blair, Brown and now Starmer. There is a reason people are screaming ‘traitor’.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “The nature of the relationship, in essence, being one of Kompromat and blackmail and involving a global VIP, pedophile, underage, rape, “grooming” gang. But the point being that Keir Starmer’s seeming inability to distance himself from Lord Mandelson until it was too late points to some form of dark influence that Mandelson had over Starmer. And we’re going to be breaking down exactly what that dark influence was and what it was informed by and what Keir Starmer is hiding. And we’re going to explain precisely how this story, the huge Epstein story connected to Lord Mandelson and Prince Andrew in the UK as it is, will lead to the fall of this Prime Minister Keir Starmer, but not only to the fall of Keir Starmer, but will lead to a lot, lot more. We’re going to explain all of that as succinctly as we can over the course of this Warrior Creed live stream.”
i) PM Tony Blair
We had previously connected Epstein through Mandelson to PM Tony Blair, who launched Britain’s ill-fated invasion of Iraq. Blair was made to meet with Epstein in Downing Street, at none other than Lord Mandelson’s request.
BBC reports 10th October 2025:
“Sir Tony Blair met with Jeffrey Epstein in Downing Street while still prime minister, following lobbying by Lord Peter Mandelson, the BBC has confirmed….Emails seen by BBC News show Lord Mandelson pushed for the meeting, telling Sir Tony’s chief of staff Jonathan Powell that Epstein was “a friend of mine” who ex-US President Bill Clinton hoped to introduce to the PM.”
ii) Epstein, Mandelson & PM Gordon Brown
Mandelson continued to exert his influence for Epstein over PM Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister who succeeded Blair.
Guido Fawkes reports 3rd February 2026:
Mandelson even went so far as to provide Epstein with advanced notification of Gordon Brown’s resignation as PM.
BBC reports 3rd February 2026:
“Crucially, Lord Mandelson appears to have kept Epstein informed of developments in the immediate aftermath of the 2010 general election, as Gordon Brown made a doomed attempt to form a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats. On 9 May, Lord Mandelson appears to tell Epstein: ‘GB now having ‘secret’ talks with [Lib Dem leader Nick] Clegg in Foreign Office’. And then, at 09.07am on Monday 10 May, he appears to tell Epstein: ‘Finally got him to go today’. Hours later, Brown announced that he would be standing down as Labour leader….”
iii) Epstein, Mandelson and PM Starmer:
But it is the relationship that Mandelson has over the current Labour leader, PM Keir Starmer that deserves the most scrutiny and is causing the most pain to the Labour party.
This is especially so since it was revealed that Starmer had appointed Mandelson to his ambassadorial role despite the British Mi6, now known as the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), having refused to approve Mandelson’s security clearance.
The Independent reports 12th September 2025:
“Serious concerns have been raised that newly sacked US ambassador Peter Mandelson did not clear security vetting for the role – but the prime minister pushed through his appointment anyway. Sources have told The Independent that MI6 failed to clear the Labour peer largely because of concerns over his business links to China. However, there were also worries that his past links to the disgraced financier and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein ‘would compromise him’. The row has broken out as Sir Keir Starmer faces serious questions about his judgement from his political opponents, but also from Labour MPs after Lord Mandelson became the latest high-profile sacking by the prime minister over issues that should have been detected earlier.”
What did Mandelson have on PM Starmer such that Starmer remained loyal to him over the advice provided by his own security services?
In fact, Starmer continued to back Mandelson right up until the day before his departure from post in Washington DC, even as Mandelson had admitted his Epstein friendship in his vetting interview?
The Times reports 10th September 2025:
“On Tuesday, Downing Street defended Mandelson and said that Starmer still had confidence in his ambassador…”
For two years prior, and despite being asked multiple times by journalists, Starmer had refused to abandon Mandelson.
Why?
The Telegraph reports 21st June 2023:
“Sir Keir Starmer will continue receiving advice from Lord Mandelson, despite accusations he maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein..”
In failing to take action against those accused of sexual crimes, Starmer has form. This is the same Keir Starmer who as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) failed to prosecute Britain’s most notorious serial pedophile, the late Sir Jimmy Saville.
The Sun reports 16th June 2020:
During the Covid years, even PM Boris Johnson had challenged Starmer (then Leader of the Opposition) on his earlier role as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for choosing not to prosecute Britain’s most notorious pedophile and personal friend of King Charles, Sir Jimmy Saville.
Click to play:
PM Boris Johnson to Keir Starmer: “This Leader of the Opposition, a former Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Speaker, if anything, he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out, Mr Speaker. He, Mr Speaker, chose to use this moment, he used this moment, Mr Speaker, continually to prejudge a police inquiry. That’s what he chose to do. He’s reached his conclusions about it. I’m not going to reach any conclusions and he would be entirely wrong to do so...”
So what exactly do serial abusers have on Starmer, such that he consistently votes to protect them? Does any of this feel right to you?
Again, this is the same Keir Starmer that whipped every single one of his MPs to vote against the UK underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs inquiry.
Upon PM Starmer’s instructions, all Labour MPs initially voted against this inquiry unanimously.
Radical Media reports 8th January 2025:
The underage rape ‘grooming’ gang scandal is the latest in a long line of sex abuse stories and dates back some years in the UK. The issue itself is not so much news anymore, but the cover up by Prime Minister Keir Starmer is.
The Times of London has been at the forefront of seeking to expose these revelations.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“The prime minister was in charge of the Crown Prosecution Service when The Times exposed a conspiracy of silence around on-street grooming among police, councils and prosecutors in 2011. The Labour leader has used his time as director of public prosecutions to his political advantage several times.”
Keir Starmer’s role as DPP in this affair has also been raised by one of the most prominent whistleblowers of this underage rape ‘grooming’ gang scandal, former police detective Maggie Oliver.
Click to play:
Whistleblower Maggie Oliver: “I shouldn’t have had to resign. It’s still, you know, 12 years on from that day, and we are still going round this same hamster wheel.”
Correspondent: “We need to see Keir Starmer stand up in the House of Commons and issue you a full and unreserved apology, don’t we?”
Maggie Oliver: “You know what Bev? Empty words mean nothing to me. I want to see him put his actions where his mouth is you know blaming this problem on far-right extremists is actually dodging the issue. He was the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) when I resigned from Rochdale, and I resigned because the charges that were being levelled at the predators and the abusers of those men, I knew in detail. I knew what had happened to them because I’ve spoken to them all. You know, being threatened at gunpoint, being passed around a room like a bull, being raped on a daily basis. And he…made the decision alongside the prosecutors that the man who got a 13-year-old pregnant didn’t face charges of rape. He was out of prison in less than four years. As a tactical option, they put a child victim of that gang on the indictment so they could get her evidence into court without even telling her. Then they tried to take her children away from her. He was the DPP. And I’m sorry, when he says that his record is clear and good, I would take him straight back to that case, which 10 years later, Bev, the Chief Constable of Manchester has publicly acknowledged, it was borderline incompetence in the handling of it on many levels. And to this day, the CPS refused to apologise for putting that victim on the indictment as a purely tactical option. So we still have a long, long way to go. And so, you know, words like yesterday, they...can again actually are blaming victims and abuse and abuse victims for standing up for their right to have their their their abusers tackled and dealt with properly it’s..smoke and mirrors and I’ve heard these things so many times that I get really angry about it.”
We are left with one conclusion. Starmer is compromised too.
We warned about Starmer’s position being thus compromised last year, on GB News with Neil Oliver, 6th February 2025:
Click to play:
Full interview with Neil Oliver on GB News can be found on youtube as Part 1 and Part 2.
“Pakistani street gangs are only one element and that’s why we immediately said this was a cover-up don’t just talk about the street level gangs they are organised gangs who have their connections in the police, the social services, the local councils, all the way up through the national political hierarchy of the Labour party. Now, since we said that, it all came out. We were pointing at the time to Lord Ahmed’s conviction for underage sex abuse, who was a Labour peer from Rotherham, which was a trigger case for these grooming gangs. Now that’s from right at the top. We were also pointing to Keir Starmer’s decision to appoint Peter Mandelson, as his ambassador to the US, Mandelson the same guy, without a doubt, on record in released court documents is proven to have visited Epstein’s island, to have gone to Epstein’s mansion in New York and to have gone to Paris for his birthday. Close friend of Epstein, more so than even Prince Andrew. Right? There’s more information on Mandelson’s relationship with him than there even was with Prince Andrew. So why was Starmer, look at how Prince Andrew was treated, why was Starmer rewarding Mandelson with the most diplomatic appointment on the planet for Britain, which is to America, right? Granting him diplomatic immunity is what it was about. So that’s how far up the rot goes, right to the top with Lord Ahmed and Peter Mandelson. By the way, both Labour and both from the Blair era, Mandelson was Blair’s ‘dark prince’ who had all the dirt on all of the politicians and that’s how he kept them in line, it’s why he was called the ‘dark prince’. Where do you think he got that dirt from if not Epstein, right? So that’s what was going on. Since we said all of that what got revealed? Well there was a Labour former Defence Minister who got arrested in a sting for attempting to solicit sexual favours from an underage boy, and then two police officers got arrested in Rotherham for being involved as well. This all came out after the scandal was recently resurrected by Musk. Proving that this is bigger, as you just said, Neil, than the mere street gang level. And it’s not just Pakistanis. This thing is a rot that goes through the system, and is actually what people used to refer to as ‘conspiracy theory’. It’s the global VIP pedophile ring that used to be run by Epstein, which is an acknowledged Mossad operation.”
Considering Starmer’s shameful conduct in the underage rape ‘grooming’ gang cases, it is offensive for his politically-appointed prosecutor, Nazir Afzal, to be pretending that he is on the side of justice.
We responded as follows:
More details of how Nazir Afzal was a containment strategy for Starmer can be found via our Radical Dispatch from 22nd October 2025.
Considering that Starmer has displayed a pattern of impotence when responding to sexual crimes in his ranks, it should come as no surprise that the problem now appears to be systemic within the Labour party, with yet another Labour MP arrested for rape.
Click to play:
Sky News: “Sky News understands that a man in his 60s that the network believes to be the MP Dan Norris has been further arrested on suspicion of rape, sexual assault, Dan Norris has been further arrested on suspicion of rape, sexual assault, voyeurism and upskirting. This is following a statement published by Avon and Somerset Police that said that an investigation into allegations of non-recent sexual offences that resulted in the arrest of a man in the 60s is continuing. The man initially arrested in April 2025 on suspicion of sexual offences against a girl, rape, child abduction and misconduct in a public office. Well, this statement goes on to say, following inquiries, the man has been further arrested on suspicion of rape against a second woman, sexual assault against a third woman, as well as voyeurism and upskirting against a number of women. We’re no longer actively investigating any sexual offences against children, but the original rape and misconduct in public office investigation is continuing. All offences are alleged to have occurred between the 2000s and 2020s. It goes on to say Avon and Somerset Police’s statement that investigations are sensitive and complex and as a result can take a significant amount of time for enquiries to be completed. The man remains on conditional bail. Well, like I say, this is the development that a man in his 60s, which Sky News understands to be the MP Dan Norris, has been further arrested on suspicion of rape, sexual assault, voyeurism and upskirting. This is following a statement given to us briefly a short while ago by Avon and Somerset police. Dan Norris, the MP, was suspended from the Labour Party in April, hasn’t attended Parliament since his release on police bail nine months ago. He says that he continues to represent constituents and that he’s continuing to ask parliamentary questions, although there is petitions calling for him to be replaced. But like I say, he remains on conditional bail and has been arrested on suspicion of rape, sexual assault, voyeurism, upskirting, like I say, the man in his 60s. We understand in this case that’s being referred to to be the MP Dan Norris. Further details on that, we’ll bring them to you here on Sky News.”
Not only must PM Starmer go, but his entire ‘institutionally pedophile’ Labour party must be removed from office.
4) Epstein & the Mossad Blackmail Operation:
So what is going on?
Corporate media narratives that Epstein could have been a KGB agent..
…are a distraction from what is by now obvious.
In short, this is a global influence operation run by Israel’s Mossad - for whom Epstein worked - to acquire compromising material on targets for the purposes of coercing their behaviour. We have explained this below.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak met with Jeffrey Epstein at least 36 times. Imagine the security clearances needed for that to happen.
These new releases have revealed that upon leaving official government service in Israel, Israeli PM Ehud Barak turned to Epstein for guidance. Epstein told him that he needed to look at Peter Thiel’s military-Ai company, Palantir.
Click to play:
Epstein: “There’s two cyber companies. Lookout and…I’ve never met Peter Thiel. And everybody says he sort of jumps around and acts like he’s on drugs.”
Ehud Barak: “Smoking, yeah. He looks under drugs.”
Epstein: “However, he has a company called Palantir. P-A-L-L-E-N-T-I-E-R. Palantir is Peter Thiel’s company..And Lookout…So he thought that Peter would put you on the board of Palantir. Peter Thiel is one of thee best…I’ve never met him, he’s gonna come here next week, so I wanted to talk to him. And to talk to you.”
Barak: “Ah Okay:”
Epstein: “He and Andreessen. He’s called Andreessen Horowitz. They pay Larry a million dollars a year just to advise them.”
Barak: “What are they, lobbyists?”
Epstein: “They are the biggest venture capital people in Silicon Valley…these are the smart boys. So those two companies right away.”
In 2024, Peter Their’s Palantir went on to provide Israel with Ai targeting software during the recent Gaza war
Bloomberg reports 12th January 2024:
We laid it this all out for our readers two years ago.
Radical Media reports 3rd April 2024:
The fact that these documents are slowly being released points to a systemic depravation of leverage.
This indicates that the Kompromat can no longer be used for the purposes of war, and so peace has a chance to settle.
This is the live takedown of the criminal globalist permawar cartel.
In this way, we are witnessing the end of the post World War II international order and the rise of the new epoch. As President Putin of Russia has already indicated, the vampires’ ball is about to end.
Click to Play:
Putin: “What is different? The gist of it is that the so-called golden billion for centuries, for 500 years, they have practically lived off of other peoples. They were ripping apart these poor peoples, poor nations of Africa. They exploited Latin America. They exploited the countries of Asia. And of course, no one forgets this. And I have a feeling that it’s not even about the leaders of this country, even though it is a very important thing, but the common people of these countries in their heart, they can feel what’s happening. They can see our struggle for our independence, for our true sovereignty. And they see this connection with their aspirations to be truly independent which is exacerbated by the fact that in the Western elites, there is a strong desire to freeze the current unfair state of things in international affairs. For centuries, They’ve been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh, and they’ve been stuffing their pockets with money, but they must realise that this ball of vampires is about to end.”
5) Other Named Individuals and How to Corroborate Them
Merely appearing on Epstein’s island, in one of his mansions, or elsewhere with him, is not conclusive proof of guilt. Such evidence does require corroboration.
Radical Media advises corroborating any name suspected of being an Epstein client or collaborator, against a robust check list of Epstein related activity. We have provided searchable databases to serve as check lists here…
To gain access to our free & searchable Epstein-related activity databases, become a premium member of Radical Media below.
