This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.
At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 28th October 2025, with a transcript provided - Grooming Rape Gangs: The Cover Up Will Be Exposed.
This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:
Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.
Grooming Rape Gangs: The Cover Up Will Be Exposed
- A Radical Dispatch
1) Labour’s Grooming Gangs Inquiry Collapses
The Labour government’s reluctantly conceded national inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs has collapsed as key survivors withdrew their cooperation amidst accusations of gaslighting.
The BBC reports 21st October 2025:
“A third abuse survivor has resigned from their role in the government’s inquiry into grooming gangs. ‘Elizabeth’ - not her real name - joined Fiona Goddard and Ellie Reynolds, who quit the inquiry’s victims and survivors liaison panel on Monday in protest. In her resignation letter, Elizabeth said the process felt like ‘a cover-up’ and had ‘created a toxic environment for survivors’.”
Since this article, five survivors have now reportedly quit the inquiry.
Reform’s Danny Kruger MP sets the tone for what is needed to finally push for transparency on this protracted topic: a pirate party such as Reform.
Danny Kruger MP: “I want to start by risking a metaphor. People keep asking me how I feel having left the sinking ship of the Tory party. And I feel pretty good. We are riding high. The wind is in our sails. I’m on a ship that is actually going somewhere. And of course, as we all know, Reform is a bit of a pirate ship, led by a buccaneering charismatic captain, an ill-disciplined crew, sometimes badly ill-disciplined, but a powerful ship with a dangerous broadside, a terror to its rivals. Now, the job of Zia and Nigel and Richard and me and our colleagues is to help turn this pirate ship into His Majesty’s royal navy ship of the line, ready to enter the king’s service and serve our nation. That is our job and it’s a serious job. And yes Reform believes that politics can be fun, but the people I’ve met since joining this party last month are deadly serious. And I was at a street stall this weekend, David Bull our chairman organised a national membership drive. And we had stalls across the country. And I was at one in Wiltshire. And one of our activists said to me about Labour and the Conservatives. He said, they call themselves the grownups. But they’re not. They’re just playing at politics. We, Reform, we need to be the real grown-ups. We need to actually take charge of the system and make it better and make it work for the country. And he was right.”
It is with that pirate spirit in mind that Nigel Farage has announced he is seeking to ‘rip up the rule book’ on the matter of underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs.
“Nigel Farage has proposed ripping up the parliamentary rulebook, setting out a brand-new approach to address the grooming gangs issue. The Reform UK chief demanded that former MPs who presided over areas which were afflicted by the rape gangs should be questioned by Parliament…declaring ‘they must have known what was going on’..”
Instead of the now discredited inquiry, Farage has proposed a full parliamentary prosecution, with the power to summon and swear witnesses in, under penalty of perjury and criminal sanction.
Click to play:
Martin Daubney: “Outline, if you could, to viewers tuning in, a novel use of parliamentary power, this select committee, and particularly making people take the oath under threat of perjury.”
Nigel Farage: “So, two months ago, I went to Washington to testify before the House Judicial Committee about the situation with free speech in Britain. And I put my hand on the bible and I thought, ‘wow, I’m in a court of law’. Now, not being an American citizen means I couldn’t perjure myself, but ‘I’m in a court of law’. I thought, ‘why doesn’t the British Parliament, why don’t our committees have these powers?’ Well, funnily enough, I was talking to Ranil Jayawardena, former Conservative minister, who said, ‘no, no, no, we’ve all forgotten.’ Fred Goodwin was summoned, remember, the ex-boss of RBS, was summoned to appear before the Treasury Select Committee after the banking collapse, in 2011. In 2011, the Public Accounts Committee were looking at wasteful money in public finances, actually got people to swear oaths before that committee. Now, 15 years has gone by, we’ve forgotten about all of this. Parliament has forgotten the powers that it has. It does have the ability to subpoena people to appear. It does have - albeit you may say these ancient laws are not current now - but it does have the ability to sanction, including imprisonment, in theory. And it does, as it did in 2011, have the ability to make people come and under oath before committee in Parliament, give their statements, which, if they lie, could be open to perjury as well. Parliament has incredible powers, but we’ve lived through 25 years of Parliament’s authority being given to quangos, being given to courts, being given to judges, and it’s time to claim it back. And my argument was that the...we call it grooming gangs, let’s be frank, the mass-rape gangs have sullied our reputation around the world. They’re a stain on our country. Do you know, up to a quarter of a million young girls have been abused by these gangs over the last few decades. The numbers are almost incomprehensible. And I want Parliament to grip this and restore public trust.”
Key ‘grooming’ gang survivor Ellie Reynolds joined Farage at a Reform party press conference to support the announcement.
Click to play:
Ellie Reynolds: “I think the inquiry that was set up, you know, it was a mess from the start. When I joined the panel, we knew from the get-go that it was messy. It was very controlling. It was very gaslighting and manipulative. You know, we went on and we all went on to do the right thing. And that was to seek justice. That was to find the truth, to not be silenced anymore and to be able to help our future. And, you know, we look at our future generations in this as well, because not only are we about ourselves, but we’re also about the present victims and the victims that can occur if this shambles continues. And the way that we were spoken to was very degrading. It was very controlling. We weren’t allowed to seek support from family members. We weren’t allowed to seek support from each and every survivor on the panel. Typically, you find with survivors is that they will confide in each other because we have been through near enough the same thing. So that is a better way that we can seek support. That was taken from us.”
Before we get to some of the details about the cover up being alleged, we remind readers that today’s Radical Dispatch should be read in conjunction with last week’s on the Epstein saga.
Radical Media reports 22nd October 2025:
2) The Labour Party Cover Up
The underage rape slave ‘grooming gang’ scandal is the latest in a long line of sex abuse stories and dates back some years in the UK. The issue itself is not so much news anymore, but the cover up by Prime Minister Keir Starmer is.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “Sir Keir Starmer, the current prime minister, failed to prosecute Britain’s most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile, when Keir Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service. He also failed to prosecute in the grooming gangs cases. So again we ask you, here’s a man who promoted Lord Mandelson from the House of Lords to being an advisor to the Labour Party, to becoming our ambassador to Washington DC, despite knowing of Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein. So instead of demoting him, he promoted him. And then backed him all the way up until one day before his resignation. What was Keir Starmer hiding? Why was he lying? Remember, if they’re hiding something, it’s because they’re covering something up. If they’re covering something up, it’s usually because there’s something on them too. That they themselves are being blackmailed because there’s compromise on them too. They’re part of the club. That’s usually the case. And so we’re asking again, what exactly was Keir Starmer covering up to the extent that he needed to shut down any prosecution into these people? ...Again, on the Warrior Creed, this isn’t new for us. We raised this at the time of the shutdown when the Labour Party, under Keir Starmer, shut down the National Enquiry and forced all of their MPs to unanimously vote against the National Enquiry into this topic.”
This is the same Labour PM, Sir Keir Starmer who whipped every single one of his MPs to vote against the UK underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs inquiry earlier this year.
Upon PM Starmer’s instructions, all Labour MPs voted unanimously against the inquiry.
Radical Media reports 8th January 2025:
The Times of London has been at the forefront of seeking to expose these revelations.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“The prime minister was in charge of the Crown Prosecution Service when The Times exposed a conspiracy of silence around on-street grooming among police, councils and prosecutors in 2011. The Labour leader has used his time as director of public prosecutions to his political advantage several times.”
Here is a summary of the basic story from this author’s days on Global’s LBC radio:
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for LBC: “In 27 cities with probably thousands of underage young girls, it must lead to a Stephen Lawrence style national inquiry looking into what the institutional failures have been, well here the majority of these girls were in care homes and therefore were let down by these care homes. One girl was she was impregnated twice before the age of 15 in her care home because an adult predator was allowed into their care home to statutorily rape her eventually found dead from a heroin overdose. There has been failures on an institutional level in the care homes up and down this country. There have been failures on an institutional level in the police up and down this country, and there have been failures on an institutional level in local Labor councils, probably not only Labor but mainly Labor councils up and down this country, because people have been scared of being called racist. And the fear of racism or the fear of so-called “Islamophobia” which is a misnomer, the fear more appropriately of anti-muslim bigotry, must never be an excuse to allow underage girls to be raped and abused in this way. Think of that, imagine that. 27 cities and counting because I can guarantee you we haven’t heard the end of this yet. Imagine the thousands of victims. Imagine the impunity with which these men must have been acting. Some of the girls as young as 11. One girl, if my memory serves me correctly, was in oxford one girl was even branded branded by her raper as property of, and then his name, on her leg. And I think if memory serves me correctly, that girl was 11 years old. It is an absolute disgrace. People have cared for their reputations over the safety of children in this country being raped and drugged and passed around like meat because of the bigotry and the prejudices of these Pakistani Muslim men who were looking down on these children as less than, as inferior, as some form of infidel that doesn’t deserve honour or dignity. And I address you now here, oh, woke left wing. You talk about believing the victim. Look it up. Go to your smartphone and Google Ella Hill. She writes a piece in The Independent in which she describes the religious extremist terminology her abusers were using as they were sexually exploiting her as a child, in which she talks of how they called her an infidel and how they abused her race and her lack of Islamic faith and justified treating her in this way because they viewed her as less than because they believed themselves to be Muslim supremacists. Don’t tell me that their Muslim identity had nothing to do with this. I have lived and breathed this community all of my life. I can guarantee you that it’s not the cause, but a factor in the way in which these girls was treated was the culture of these men. And as part of that culture is their religious attitude towards non-Muslims. And that is the reason that you see almost exclusively that they are men like me, Pakistani, British, Muslim. Most of them, all of them Muslims, almost all Pakistani Muslims. And the victims, almost all underaged white girls. We started to convict people. Yes, I listed those 27 cities for you. which is bad enough as it is. But where’s the accountability for the police who covered this up? Where’s the accountability for the Labour councils who covered this up? Where are the accolades for Anne Cryer MP, former Labour MP in Keeley, who raised this years and years ago? Was a sole voice, crying out into the wilderness, beseeching people to listen to her. Then came Julie Bindell, the first to write columns about this. Ignored, in fact, she writes herself that in 2007 she was looking into this and her pieces were shelved. Look how Sarah Champion was treated, Labour frontbencher who was sacked because she said this was a problem. And now finally, the independent police watchdog has said, yes, it was covered up by the police. Well, that’s not good enough because nothing short of this national and statutory inquiry will satisfy the victims and bring them dignity and honour, but also quell the anger that people are rightfully feeling as these cases unfold. As I say, it is a national disgrace.”
Keir Starmer’s role as DPP has also been raised by one of the most prominent whistleblowers of this underage rape ‘grooming’ gang scandal, former police detective Maggie Oliver.
Click to play:
Whistleblower Maggie Oliver: “I shouldn’t have had to resign. It’s still, you know, 12 years on from that day, and we are still going round this same hamster wheel.”
Correspondent: “We need to see Keir Starmer stand up in the House of Commons and issue you a full and unreserved apology, don’t we?”
Maggie Oliver: “You know what Bev? Empty words mean nothing to me. I want to see him put his actions where his mouth is you know blaming this problem on far-right extremists is actually dodging the issue. He was the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) when I resigned from Rochdale, and I resigned because the charges that were being levelled at the predators and the abusers of those men, I knew in detail. I knew what had happened to them because I’ve spoken to them all. You know, being threatened at gunpoint, being passed around a room like a bull, being raped on a daily basis. And he…made the decision alongside the prosecutors that the man who got a 13-year-old pregnant didn’t face charges of rape. He was out of prison in less than four years. As a tactical option, they put a child victim of that gang on the indictment so they could get her evidence into court without even telling her. Then they tried to take her children away from her. He was the DPP. And I’m sorry, when he says that his record is clear and good, I would take him straight back to that case, which 10 years later, Bev, the Chief Constable of Manchester has publicly acknowledged, it was borderline incompetence in the handling of it on many levels. And to this day, the CPS refused to apologise for putting that victim on the indictment as a purely tactical option. So we still have a long, long way to go. And so, you know, words like yesterday, they...can again actually are blaming victims and abuse and abuse victims for standing up for their right to have their their their abusers tackled and dealt with properly it’s..smoke and mirrors and I’ve heard these things so many times that I get really angry about it.”
Indeed, it is the cover up that has angered so many, and will continue to do so.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz on WARRIOR CREED: “Now, we mentioned the cover-up, which is why people are so upset. Understand why people are so upset. This is a systemic cover-up. We have institutional failures in our police, in our Labour government and in our local Labour council and in our child protection services. All of which have been complicit in covering this up and for which multiple reports have also come to this same conclusion that they’ve been covering it up. And whistleblower former police detective Maggie Oliver in particular has been speaking about Keir Starmer as director of public prosecutions, covering this up when he made the decision alongside other prosecutors that a man who got a 13-year-old pregnant should not face charges of rape.”
3) A Parliamentary Prosecution
It is in these murky waters of a protracted cover up that Labour’s reluctant inquiry into the grooming gangs issue has just collapsed, amidst survivor allegations of obstruction and gaslighting. And it is in this context that Nigel Farage has called for a parliamentary prosecution in the full glare of the media.
Click to play:
Martin Daubney: “…something else astonishing that came out today was when Ellie Ann Reynolds said this has been a mess from the start, it’s been controlling, gaslighting, manipulative, a shambles, and more to the point, all shrouded in secrecy. You said earlier on, this should all be held in the open. It should be televised for the entire media to see, and the public to see.”
Nigel Farage: “The Palace of Westminster, the mother of Parliament, I mean, there’s the image behind you. It is one of the most incredible buildings in the world. I want that to be turned into a court. It has the ability to do this. It’s done it through history. It’s done it, as I say, 15 years ago. I want the full glare of media publicity. I want social workers. I want police officers. I want councillors. I want former MPs in those areas who must have known what was going on, simply must have known what was going on, to appear before that court. And I think it can be done quickly. I mean, think about it, Starmer u-turned earlier on this year on a public inquiry. Nearly five months have elapsed. Nothing has happened. They can’t even agree a Chair. So I think this is the right place to do it, in the full glare of media publicity and to do it quickly.”
As Farage has said, such an approach could well benefit parliament too, by restoring trust in our failing national institutions. He is correct.
Click to play:
Nigel Farage: “What I am saying, here is the most enormous opportunity for Parliament and indeed for this government, to restore some public trust in the institution and those that currently inhabit it, on an issue that has been gnawing away at our public consciences for well over a decade.”
Farage and the Reform party suggestion comes as few believe that the Labour party will properly investigate themselves.
Click to play:
Zia Yusuf, Reform Party: “And I think Nigel’s right that this, sadly, the statutory inquiry that Labour were dragged kicking and screaming into is dead in the water. I mean, five survivors have resigned from the inquiry already. All five have called for Jess Phillips’s resignation. And look, as soon as something like that happens, I’m afraid the inquiry has lost an enormous amount of credibility. Look, those are the ones who have publicly resigned, which would suggest no doubt there’s going to be more who have concerns, perhaps privately. What Nigel is saying, that actually something that people appear - in the political class - to have forgotten, which is the UK Parliament, the cradle of democracy, the cockpit of democracy, has extraordinary power. What needs to be true now is we cannot allow Labour to just kick the can down the road, which I think was why they reluctantly agreed, because they could kick the can down the road until the next general election, after the next general. We can’t allow that to happen. The survivors and the victims of the rape gangs have suffered more than enough. As Ellie, I mean, she was absolutely incredible today. I encourage anyone watching this, I know there’s some short clips there, please go and watch the press conference. She spoke, I was taken aback by how beautifully and eloquently and passionately she spoke, and is so bravely. And she was saying, listen, one of the reasons she resigned is because they’ve had enough. People like her have had enough as victims of being told by social workers to stop attention seeking, being told by the police to go home, you know, and stop attention seeking. What we’re saying is, let’s use the powers of Parliament. Parliament has the power to subpoena, it has the power to compel witnesses to attend in front of a panel, and it has the power to compel them to tell the truth under penalty of perjury. And yes, we do need cameras there so that there is full transparency, which also then gets us away from the place of one person’s word against another, which is... clearly in some ways what we see right now.And yes, that does mean we have to have politicians involved, but it will mean we get to the truth, which is the crucial thing here, Nana. We will get to the truth much, much faster.”
It clearly would not suit Starmer and his current Labour government to agree to any of this. Much of this looks unlikely unless the British public removes PM Starmer from office and elects PM Farage instead. For survivors, and according to new polling, the chances of that happening are looking…
To continue reading become a premium member of Radical Media by upgrading below.
