Woke VS Warhawk: Globalists Provoke Communal Riots to Stop Middle East Peace

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.

At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 1st July 2025, with a transcript provided - Woke VS Warhawk: Globalists Provoke Communal Violence to Stop Middle East Peace.

This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:

Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.

---

Woke VS Warhawk: Globalists Provoke Communal Riots to Stop Middle East Peace

- A Radical Dispatch

1) Trump declares Gaza Ceasefire

President Trump announced on Tuesday that the Israelis have accepted a 60-day Gaza ceasefire.

As the recent war between Iran and Israel demonstrated, Trump has been seeking to calm regional tensions, even as Netanyahu attacked Iran mid-way through ongoing US / Iran nuclear peace talks.

Radical Media reports 18th June 2025:

Last week’s Radical Dispatch made clear that Netanyahu’s war mongering goes back many years through multiple previous US administrations, all of which Trump has recently once again criticised.

Click to play:

President Trump: “President Obama was a terrible president. President Biden was the worst president in the history of our country. President Bush should not have gone into the Middle East and blown the place up. So I don't give him high marks here. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. I give Trump very high marks. Goodbye, everybody.”

And as the ceasefire brokered by Trump to end the 12-day Iran/Israel war highlighted, Trump’s aim has been to stabilise the Middle East using a regional framework.

Radical Media reports 26th June reports 2025:

Only with this regional framework in mind do recent US actions in the Middle East begin to make sense.

First, Trump went around the Israelis and began agreeing regional ceasefires, such as with the Yemeni Houthi militia.

Then Trump delivered a keynote speech in Saudi capital Riyadh decrying past US interventionism in the Middle East.

Radical Media reports 15th May 2025:

As all that was going on, Trump had even initiated nuclear peace talks with Iran, before Netanyahu interrupted them by attacking Iran.

Now, as well as having just announced Israel’s agreement to a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, Trump has lifted long-standing and crippling US sanctions on Syria.

Syria’s new President Ahmad al-Shara is even making peace overtures towards Israel.

Our regulars will by now have noted that all of this indicates peace is President Trump’s trajectory, and that a grand regional settlement for peace is coming.

2) Globalists are Radicalising the West to Prevent Trump’s Peace

Whereas Trump has proven to be a president with a strong anti-war trajectory, there are certain factions within, and allied to, his administration that seek to use war to circumvent the peace.

But stoking such war is not possible without radicalising one’s target audiences. If Muslims cannot make peace with Jews in the West, this undermines Trump’s attempts to make peace between Muslims and Jews in the East. No mandate for peace at home makes carrying a mandate for peace abroad almost impossible.

This is why - as peace draws nearer - enemies of the peace will seek to radicalise the left and right, the woke and the warhawks, in order to stir lasting sectarian and communal violence, so that peace is prevented.

Click to play:

Maajid Nawaz on this week’s WARRIOR CREED: “Those who believe in the globalist technocratic security state can only continue to encroach upon our civil liberties with technocracy in the context of using war and other emergencies as an excuse. Other emergencies such as COVID, for example, we know how that went down. But war is another great excuse for globalist technocrats to expand the reach of the technocratic surveillance state. And Netanyahu being a key globalist figure, just look at his behaviour during COVID as an example, being a key globalist war hawk, has every interest in making sure that war, permawar, continues. So Netanyahu and his Likudnik-Zionist network are at pains to ensure to undermine Trump's peace, Trump's negotiated peace in the Middle East, and ensure that the Abraham Accords don't happen. So with understanding those two camps, the fact that there are those who are working for peace in power, and there are those in power who are war hawks, the globalists, we will better understand what the war hawks are planning to do to undermine the those who are calling for peace. And that's why the topic of today, ‘woke versus warhawk’, is as it is. Because the idea we're going to present to you, with receipts, is that the globalists are the same globalists who back ‘the warhawks’, and they're the same globalists who back ‘the woke’. Essentially, what we're saying to you is: globalist technocrats have a vested interest in your radicalisation…”

This is the context in which the recent “Death to the IDF” controversy at Glastonbury should be seen. As the ethnic cleansing in Gaza draws on, activists on both sides - woke and warhawk - are inching towards further intransigence.

Click to play:

Bob Vylan at Glastonbury: “Free, free, Palestine! Free, free, Palestine! Free, free, Palestine! All right, but have you heard this one, though? Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF! Hell yeah, from the river to the sea, Palestine must be, will be, inshallah, it will be free!”

Meanwhile, the globalist state exploits such outbursts to increase its counter-terrorism powers.

The BBC reports 30th June 2025:

The state has form in this regard. It was already seeking to ban Palestine Action under counter-terror laws for breaking into airforce bases to daub graffiti on RAF fighter jets.

Reuters reports 23rd June 2025:

Casting the Glastonbury ‘Death to the IDF’ outburst by punk-rap band Bob Vylan as an attack on “all jews” - as former leader of Reform UK Richard Tice has done - only serves to further feed the state’s clampdown on all dissent.

We replied to Richard Tice.

Click to play:

Former Lord Chief Justice of the UK Supreme Court Jonathan Sumption: “There are clear rules against genocide and genocide is becoming an increasingly plausible explanation of what is now happening in Gaza, because there have been statements by Netanyahu to committees of the Knesset which suggests that the object of the campaign that's been in progress since the 16th of May is to encourage large-scale emigration of the population of Gaza to neighbouring countries, other of course than Israel itself, by killing them and starving them.”

Broadcaster Matt Frei: “Let me ask the question very clearly and simply then, is genocide taking place in Gaza as far as you're concerned?”

Lord Sumption: “I think all I'm prepared to say at the moment is that that is the most plausible explanation of what is happening. Obviously, a great deal more investigation will be necessary before one can say that the position is entirely clear.”

Broadcaster Matt Frei: “Is ethnic cleansing taking place in Gaza?”

Lord Sumption: “It looks like that, does it not?”

Broadcaster Matt Frei: “And the Israelis, of course, would say they're doing this and they are targeting hospitals and schools, even though they don't want to, per se, because that's where Hamas is hiding and that's where they're using Palestinian civilians as human shields.”

Lord Sumption: “There is a good deal of evidence that Hamas does cite its facilities underneath places that are less vulnerable to Israeli attacks. But, I mean, frankly, that is too bad. Beyond a point, you cannot simply destroy unlimited numbers of lives to achieve a military objective. The gross breaches of international humanitarian law which are currently happening in Gaza.”

Broadcaster Matt Frei: “Let's talk about these breaches. What kind of breaches, as a lawyer, are you seeing there?”

Lord Sumption: “Well, first of all, there is a general principle which is enshrined in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 that you cannot attack even legitimate military targets if that would produce disproportionate casualties among civilians. It seems to me to be clear that attacks on hospitals and schools full of sick patients or children on the grounds that there's a Hamas command centre underneath them are disproportionate. This is killing on an indiscriminate scale.”

Broadcaster Matt Frei: “Why has it taken so long for a letter like this to be written and signed by you?”

Lord Sumption: “Well, there was an earlier letter, which I also signed, 18 months or so ago. Since then, a great deal more has happened, and since May the 16th of this year, an intensification of the fight against the Gazans, and also a shift in the justification which Israel is using to defend itself.”

Amidst the furore over the behaviour of a punk-rap band at Glastonbury, real ethnic cleansing that is “most plausibly genocide” is still ongoing. We should be far more concerned about that. Distracting us has been the desired result.

And lest any reader get the wrong idea, none of the above should be read as support for Kneecap or Bob Vylan either. Our entire point is that both sides are being radicalised for divide and conquer purposes.

Your reaction is the point.

This is woke versus warhawk. Punk-rap bands like Kneecap and Bob Vylan are being used, whether they know it or not, to start fires. This is so that their warhawk adversaries have the pretext to call in the fire brigade and simply douse your entire flame of conscientious objection to ongoing ethnic cleansing in Gaza.

The result of such clumsy yet emotionally charged protests is clear for all to see. A chilling effect takes hold over everyone else.

NPR reports 30th June 2025:

This came after the same had already happened to Kneecap.

The BBC reports 21st May 2025:

“A member of Irish language hip-hop group Kneecap has been charged with a terror offence after allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed organisation Hezbollah at a London gig.”

Not that the vast majority of the world’s Muslims - who are 80% Sunni - needed Kneecap to endorse the Shia Islamist terrorist group that fought to uphold Assad’s brutal repression of Sunni Muslims in Syria.

But this radicalisation is not just occurring on the woke side of the debate.

The case of Lucy Connolly highlights the hypocrisy of the warhawks too. They express moral outrage over the Glastonbury chants yet have no problem championing Connolly’s case. This is despite Connolly not only having called for violence, but the violence that she called for then took place exactly as she demanded.

The BBC reports 25th May 2025:

“Rupert Lowe, the independent MP for Great Yarmouth, said the situation was "morally repugnant", external and added: ‘This is not the Britain I want to live in. Others said her supporters wanted a ‘right to be racist’. In July last year, prompted by a false rumour that an illegal immigrant was responsible for the murder of three girls at a dance workshop in Southport, Connolly posted online calling for ‘mass deportation now’, adding ‘set fire to all the... hotels [housing asylum seekers]... for all I care’. Connolly, then a 41-year-old Northampton childminder, added: ‘If that makes me racist, so be it.’ At the time she had about 9,000 followers on X. Her message was reposted 940 times and viewed 310,000 times…”

After this post by Connolly, as national communal riots engulfed the UK, two asylum hotels were subsequently burned by a lynch mob, while entire families were still inside them.

Comparing the Connolly case with the Glastonbury cases highlights the radicalisation occurring on both sides left and right, with neither realising that they complain about their adversary while doing the very same themselves. In the end, we all lose. That is the entire point: problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian Dialectic.

The only way to win is not to play.

Protect the peace.

3) Globalist Elon Musk Funds Both Sides: Woke and Warhawk

Circumventing the peace requires not only causing communal rancour, it also requires candidates to emerge who are able to exploit this rancour to disrupt the peace via their ability to divide the electoral base of the leaders working for that peace. Enter Elon Musk.

In the US, Musk recently pledged support to anti-Israel Congressman Thomas Massie, in order to undermine Trump. His money will be used to own Thomas Massie, just like Peter Thiel owns JD Vance.

In the UK, Musk has pledged support to anti-Islam parliamentarian Rupert Lowe who left the Reform Party, in order to undermine Nigel Farage.

Yes, that’s this Rupert Lowe, whose policy suggestions range from shooting pro-Palestine protestors.

Middle East Eye reports 27th June 2025:

To banning items of clothing.

Everything globalist technocrats do is to stop the peace and continue the wars so that their digital surveillance state continues to grow. By funding both sides of the ideological divide in this way, anti-Israel in the US but anti-Palestine in the UK, Musk’s aim becomes clear: to outflank Trump from the right by funding Massie, and outflank Nigel Farage on the right by funding Lowe.

Musk undermines both Trump and Farage because both have repeatedly stood against any new wars, whereas Musk is allied instead to Netanyahu, who seeks to undo the Middle East peace that Trump is planning.

As Steve Bannon recently indicated, Musk’s objection is not Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’. This is an excuse for Musk. What Musk truly seeks is to expand the power of the technocrats in Big-Tech, at the expense of the Federal government.

Click to play:

Steve Bannon: “There are no coincidences, folks, that one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse on AI is Elon Musk. The Tesla, the company Tesla making cars is imploding. He's trying to switch it to an AI company. It shouldn't be lost on you. His fight against President Trump has nothing to do with debt. Right, nothing to do with debt. His immaturity, even talking about how you go about it, it's a huge problem. As you know, we've been fighting this thing on War Room. His immaturity in doing it shows that he's a clown. This is all about he got cut out of EV, he got cut out of his subsidies. He's also, he understood where President Trump stands and having the back of the American people who are very concerned about AI. It may have tremendous benefits. It's clearly going to be in every part of life, but the American people want to have a say-so in this. Right? The little guy says, hey, I think my voice ought to be heard. That was what yesterday was.”

Our regulars will know that we at Radical Media had forecast this already, last June.

Radical Media reports 12th June 2025:

But MAGA were not fooled, as Trump’s base is both anti-large government, and anti-technocratic state.

Neither Musk’s desired technocracy, nor an over-sized federal government are the answer. As we suggested to Joe Rogan back in 2022 in episode 1780, decentralisation is key.

In this vein, provisions have been removed from the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ that would have granted this ten year moratorium for Big Tech regulation.

The Hill reports 1st July 2025:

“Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) cheered the Senate’s decision Tuesday to remove a provision from Republicans’ sweeping tax bill that would have barred states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI), calling it a ‘huge win for federalism.’ Despite initially voting for the House version of the bill containing the AI moratorium, Greene has since become a vocal opponent of the measure, arguing it violates states’ rights. ‘Banning states from regulating AI for 10 years is a gift to Big Tech and a disaster for American workers and states’ rights,’ Greene continued. ‘Thanks to Senator Marsha Blackburn, we got it OUT. That’s a huge win for federalism and the America First agenda’.”

Musk and his Big-Tech ‘baby mafia’ are losing, and they will lose as Trump hints that trouble may be headed Musk’s way.

Click to play:

Journalist: “Will you ever deport Elon Musk?“

President Trump: “I don't know. I think we'll have to take a look. We might have to put Doge on Elon. You know what Doge is? Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible? He gets a lot of subsidies, Peter. But Elon is very upset that the EV mandate is going to be terminated. And you know what? When you look at it, who wants? Not everybody wants an electric car. I don't want an electric car. I want to have baby gasoline, maybe electric, maybe a hybrid, maybe someday a hydrogen. If you have a hydrogen car, it has one problem. It blows up.”

4) New York City: Ground Zero for Woke Vs Warhawk

The focal point for globalists seeking to provoke communal strife at the expense of the peace seems to be New York City, where the woke versus warhawk tension is set to take centre stage due to the NYC mayoral race.

NYC Democrats have just selected a rather woke and self-described ‘Muslim Socialist’ Zohran Mamdani in their mayoral primaries, which means he could very likely be the next NYC mayor. Mamdani looks like he graduated from the Obama school of political smarm, combined with the BLM school of political operations.

Mamdani is an Ugandan-Indian American. He is effectively a ‘Shi’ite Muslim Corbyn’ who will be unleashed on NYC replete with all his “defund the police” woke activism being torpedoed to office off the back of legitimate sympathy for Gaza, and a misguided anti-Trump sentiment that is peculiar to NYC.

Click to play:

Fox News Broadcaster: “If we can pull up some of his proposals here, you got freeze the rent, city run grocery stores, $70 billion worth of debt to fund affordable housing, free buses, no cost child care, baby baskets to newborns, $30 minimum wage, a few more not on this list here, defund NYPD, defund prisons, defund medical bills, and get rid of private insurance. Your thoughts?”

Curtis Silwa: “But in typical political fashion, do as I say, not as I do, he claims he's under threat, right? So who's protecting him now? Off-duty NYPD armed officers. Who does he want protecting New Yorkers? Social workers. Hey, Mamdami, do what you suggest everybody do. Why isn't he being protected by social workers? I'm a guy who was shot five times by the Gettys and Gambinos in 1992. I travel by myself. I'm in the streets. I'm in the subways. I'm the people's mayor, you have to have a feel. You know I hate to break the baby boomers bubble, because I'm a baby boomer. The millennials are the majority now. Do the analytics, you must get millennials on your side to win elections. I've been working with young people my whole life, as leader of the Guardian Angels here and in 13 countries and 130 cities around the world. You need to be able to motivate people. Look, fault him as you will. You keep throwing stuff at him. You just strengthen him with millennials. We have to bring the millennials to us. Wasn't Trump able to do that with male millennials? And that probably was part of his pathway to victory. We have to start doing that now in New York City. And I'm the only one to do that. We're in this mess now. Why? Because Eric Adams failed as a mayor or he would have been the Democratic nominee seeking reelection.”

Mamdani’s shi’ia Muslim affiliation, and his being of East African Indian origins, are highly relevant (whether he knows this or not) in the context of what just happened between the shia Islamist theocracy in Iran, and Israel under the Likudnik warhawks.

Mamdani is being accused - with some evidence - by the dark twin of this operation, the Warhawk Likudnik-Zionists, of having sung the praises of Hamas in his previous “career” as a pop-rapper (who was not that good).

Click to play:

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “Your likely democratic challenger Mamdani, because you said recently that the Jewish community in New York should be concerned about him. You've accused him of using anti-Semitic rhetoric. What specifically has Mamdani said that you think is anti-Semitic?”

Former NYC Mayor Eric Adams: “Pro-Hamas. Hamas is a dangerous terrorist organisation that should be destroyed. When you embrace the philosophies of Hamas, not only what they do to their own people, but what they did in Gaza to lift them up and praise them, I think that's a clear indicator that something is wrong with that.”

Tapper: “When did he praise Hamas? I don't recall him ever praising Hamas.”

Adams: “There's several videos, even during his days, of being a rap artist, of praising Hamas and other terrorist groups. And so a little research, you'll be able to find it. But I'm not competing against him only for what he's done and praising Hamas. I'm competing against him because this is not a socialist city. And that much of what he's promising to people, which I think is really deplorable, people that are struggling, like my family did, of living without the means that we needed, when you promise them that you're going to give everything away free and you don't have the authority as the mayor to do so, he doesn't have the authority to raise income tax on the top 1% of New Yorkers. Assemblymen have that authority, and that's who he is. He couldn't do it in assembly. How are you going to deliver it as the mayor of the city?”

Tapper: “He has. I mean, he obviously caught the imagination of a lot of Democratic voters. His victory was pretty handy. He's talking about rent freezes, which he does have the power to do. Free bus service, universal child care, creating city run grocery stores. Do you disagree with those programs or just he doesn't have the authority to do it on his own?”

Adams: “Let's go back. You said rent freeze. He has the authority to do so. No, he does not. There's the independent rent guideline boards that independently make that decision. So he does not have the authority to do that. He had the authority to do free buses. I gave him a pilot project to do when he was in the assembly. He failed to carry out on it. Four years in the assembly. He has not passed one bill. H’s making promises to people that are really struggling, that he can't deliver on. The foundation of all the things he wants to do for free is coming from an income tax increase on the one percent. He does not have the authority as a mayor to do that. He has the authority as an assemblyman and he did not accomplish everything he's talking about doing now. He could have done in the state, but he failed to do so.”

The ingredients are all there for it to all kick off like a powder keg: NYC’s pro-Hamas woke versus NYC’s pro-Netanyahu, Big Finance neo-cons. Woke versus warhawk.

This aims to cause real world chaos, televised anti-semitism and anti-Muslim hate popularised during a mayoral race, combined, and amplified by globalist tech bros. The aim: ‘the house always wins’. Sectarian anti-Muslim and anti-Jew hatred televised globally as a way for Big Finance globalists in NYC to wreck Trump’s Middle East peace between Muslims and Jews, so that they don’t lose their military industrial globalist war machine. If Muslims cannot make peace with Jews in the West, their governments will not be able to make peace between Muslims and Jews in the Middle East.

In this context, readers can expect to see certain media pundits amplifying their anti-Islam rhetoric as the mayoral race approaches.

Click to play:

Charlie Kirk of Turning Point: “Do you think that Islam compatible with Western civilisation?”

Gad Saad: “The short answer? No. Of course, millions of Muslims decide to ignore the…incongruent elements of their religion, they're practicing cafeteria Islam, right? They're choosing the parts that they agree with. And they're ignoring the parts that they don't agree with. But once Islam becomes, never mind a majority, if it becomes a strong minority, we have 1400 years of history that tells us what happens to all of the foundational values that we hold dearly in the West, right? I mean, you don't have to, you know, believe me, you could just study history, right? I mean, almost every single one of the 56 countries that I mentioned a few minutes ago, started off with having zero Islam, and then you close and open your eyes, suddenly it's 99.9% Islam. How did that happen? In some cases, it takes five years for it to happen. In some cases, it takes 500 years to happen. But inshallah, it will always happen. I'll mention one other thing. Many of your viewers may not know this. Since 9-11 alone, Charlie, so that's 24 years, there have been 47,000-plus terror attacks committed by Islamic terrorists in nearly 70 countries. And now there are multiple databases that you can use to prove that this number is correct. 47,000 terror attacks. So that should give you a sense of whether Islam is compatible with the West or not.”

Charlie Kirk: “So why is it that so many Muslims are moving to Western countries? Is it just economics or is there something more ideological at play here?”

Gad Saad: “It's both. Of course, many Muslims have no interest in conquering anyone and they want, as you just said, exactly what you said, which is ‘I want better economic opportunities for me and my children’ and so on. But the Muslim Brotherhood and many other Islamic theorists and scholars and politicians, have said that we will conquer the West through three means. And I hope that your listeners and viewers take note. Number one, we will conquer the West through the womb of our women. So that's a demographic fertility battle. We will produce five children, you will produce 1.2 children, and we will outbreed you. Number two, we will conquer the West through hijra. Hijra is the Arabic word for immigration, and that's exactly what we do with our open border policies. And number three, we will conquer the West by using your miserable freedoms and liberties against you. They're screaming this out from the top of the mountain, And yet most Westerners choose to ignore Charlie. It is so galling. It is so frustrating. I escaped that world 45 plus years ago. And here it is now hunting me down 50 years later.”

And if there was any doubt that this anti-Islam rhetoric, just like it’s anti-Semitic twin, is being encouraged by the warhawks, do recall that Charlie Kirk’s same guest above, Gad Saad, is a self-confessed Mossad asset.

Here he is in an interview talking about his Mossad background….

To continue reading and to see video of Gad Saad confessing to being a Mossad asset, become a premium member of Radical Media.