Prince Andrew Accuser Virginia Guiffre in "Fatal Accident" Prior to Epstein Files Release

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.

At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 1st April 2025, with a transcript provided - Prince Andrew Accuser Virginia Giuffre in Fatal Accident Prior to Epstein Files Release.

This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:

Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.

---

Above image is from Guiffre’s Instagram page

Prince Andrew Accuser Virginia Guiffre in Fatal Accident Prior to Epstein Files Release

Dateline NBC's Chris Hanson Vows to "Catch the Predators" Among Epstein's Client List

- Plus the WARRIOR CREED Podcast

1) Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre is ‘dying’

Prince Andrew accuser, and the most well-known of the victims in the Epstein case, Virginia Giuffre has said on her personal Instagram page that she has four days to live after apparently being involved in a road traffic collision. Though there are many questions.

The story had been reported a day earlier by Sky News, citing Giuffre’s own social media post as the source.

Sky News reports 31st March 2025

Sky News reports 31st March 2025: “A woman who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault says she has four days to live after a car accident. In a post on Instagram, Virginia Giuffre said she was in a car that was hit by a school bus ‘driving 110km [68.3mph] as we were slowing for a turn’.

Ms Giuffre then said: ‘I've gone into kidney renal failure, they've given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology’…”

Virginia Giuffre is considered the most prominent of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims to have spoken out.

Click to play:

Virginia Giuffre: “…Ghislaine woke me up in the morning and said, you're going to meet a prince today. I didn't know at that point that I was going to be trafficked to that prince. And then that night, Prince Andrew came to her house in London. And we went out to Club Tramp. Prince Andrew got me alcohol. It was in the VIP section. I’m pretty sure it was vodka. Prince Andrew was like, let's dance together. And I was like, OK. And we leave Club Tramp. And I'd hop in the car with Ghislaine and Jeffrey. And Ghislaine said he's coming back to the house. And I want you to do for him what you do for Epstein. I just couldn't believe it. I couldn't believe that even royalty were involved.”

A day after the Sky News report, the Times of London followed up with more details.

The Times reports 1st April 2025:

The Times reports 1st April 2025:

“Virginia Giuffre, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who alleges that she was trafficked to Prince Andrew and sexually abused, has said she was involved in a car crash and has only days to live. Giuffre, 41, posted a photograph of herself on Instagram with a visible head injury and lying on a hospital bed, writing that she was in renal failure as a result of injuries after a collision with a bus. ‘This year has been the worst start to a new year, but I won’t bore anyone with the details but I think it important to note that when a school bus driver comes at you driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn that no matter what your car is made of it might as well be a tin can,’ she wrote on Sunday. ‘I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology. I’m ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes’…After the settlement, Giuffre and Prince Andrew issued a joint statement in which the duke pledged to ‘demonstrate his regret’ for his association with Epstein ‘by supporting the fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims’.

Giuffre said the money of the settlement would go towards Speak Out, Act, Reclaim, a charity she set up that works with the victims of abuse. She was briefly under a gag agreement as part of the settlement, and has since declined media interviews.”

2) Is Giuffre credible?

Interestingly, and in a since edited article, The Times noted that Giuffre has been a recent critic of US Attorney General Pam Bondi and the much delayed, yet promised, release of the ‘Epstein Files’ by the Department of Justice.

The Times reports 1st April 2025:

Note: curiously, this Times article has since been edited to remove the cited section.

Since her evidence could be useful to corroborate claims made about any names eventually released, this does give rise to concerns about Giuffre’s safety at a juncture so close to any promised release of Epstein’s client list. Speculation about whether the accident was instead an attempt on her life will thus be quite natural in this context.

To further muddy the waters, Australian police reports seemed to contradict Guiffre’s version of events, stating instead that the crash was a ‘minor’ incident that left ‘no report of serious injuries’ and only '$2000 worth of damage’ to the car.

The Times reports 1st April 2025:

Note: curiously, this Times article has since been edited to remove the cited sections.

Though these sections have since been removed from the Times, the police reaction was reported widely across other media.

The Evening Standard reports 1st April 2025:

In a strange twist that only muddied the waters further, Giuffre put out a follow up statement claiming that she had meant to post the news to her private facebook account.

The UK’s Metro reports (updated) 1st April 2025:

“Prince Andrew’s sex assault accuser made a mistake when she said she had been involved in a car crash and had ‘four days to live’…But her family has now said she did not intend to share the post publicly, thanking people for the ‘outpouring of love and support’ she has received in the meantime.”

This update left readers even more bewildered.

While some social media commentators have stated their outright suspicion as to Giuffre’s motives and credibility.

3) How is this related to the pending release of the Epstein clients list?

With the promised yet much delayed release of the Epstein clients list pending, it becomes paramount to ensure that Virginia Giuffre lives, as she is a corroborating witness to determine whom Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked underage victims to.

So far, Ghislaine Maxwell is the only woman to have been convicted for trafficking underage victims to absolutely nobody.

It could be that the sensitivities around this pending - but delayed - release of more suspect names, have pushed Giuffre into an unsafe position.

The Times reports 11th February 2025:

“Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘client list’ is set to be released by a new Trump administration task force charged with the declassification of federal secrets.”

Radical Media has previously reported on this delay.

Radical Media reports 26th February 2025:

Though the Trump administration has spared little effort to signal that it seeks the full declassification of these files, not least by appointing Representative Anna Paulina Luna as head of a Congressional Oversight Committee for said declassification.

Click to play:

Representative Anna Paulina on declassifiying Epstein’s Client list:

“..it is a profound honour that I have been entrusted…to lead the House Oversight Task Force on declassification of Federal secrets…we’ll be conducting investigations into the following: the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and Dr Martin Luther King…the Epstein client list, the origins of Covid-19 and the 9/11 FILES…our first hearing is set for March.”

The Independent reports 12th February 2025:

“A new congressional task force is weighing whether to release a slew of national secrets - and Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘client list’ could be among the documents declassified. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer announced the establishment of the investigative unit Tuesday. Republican Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna will lead the task force that will decide whether to publish materials related to federal government interests and ‘end an era of secrecy,’ …along with releasing the disgraced financier’s contact list, her team will investigate the September 11 terrorist attacks, the origins of Covid-19, the assassinations of former President John F Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, and UFOs.”

Corporate media had already started to notice the delays.

Newsweek reports 25th February 2025:

“On Thursday, February 20, Attorney General Pam Bondi indicated that files pertaining to the late sex offender Jeffery Epstein are set to be released; the fact that they are yet to be released is raising questions from Republican politicians….On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump suggested he would be open to releasing the Epstein ‘client list.’ This rumored list is believed by some to implicate high-profile figures in sex crimes.”

And lawmakers had already started to demand explanations for why the files have not yet been released.

Politico reports 25th February 2025:

“Lawmakers across the political spectrum have taken to X to urge Bondi to make good on her promise — an early, rare point of pressure Republican members of Congress have tried to exert over the administration. Leading the pack is Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), who chairs a task force on the ‘declassification of federal secrets.’ The release of records related to the investigation into Epstein’s crimes is one of the task force’s major priorities. The outspoken Florida Republican started posting about the release of the Epstein documents on X on Monday, directing her grievances at Bondi.”

Leading the charge for full and unredacted declassification has been Tennessee’s elected officials, including Senator Marsha Blackburn.

New York Post reports 24th February 2025:

“Sen. Marsha Blackburn called Monday on newly inaugurated FBI Director Kash Patel to follow through on his commitment to transparency in the case of notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein. Blackburn (R-Tenn.), 72, insisted Patel and acting IRS Commissioner Douglas O’Donnell release their respective agencies’ ‘complete, unredacted records’ on Epstein amid longstanding public questions and speculation about his associates that have swirled since his death in 2019.”

Having had multiple opportunities to backtrack on the story, instead US Attorney General Pam Bondi has repeatedly insisted that such declassification is indeed coming.

Click to play:

Correspondent: “Scaring bad guys is something Kash has talked about a lot, and you have, when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and the people who are predators in this country. They've been given a pass, and a lot of Americans think these guys have got to pass for a long time, and maybe even are still being protected right now. Where are we at with the Jeffrey Epstein list, the documents? And Kash has made a lot of public statements about this. Where are we at?”

AG Pam Bondi: “I was briefed on that yesterday. I can't talk about that publicly, but, you know, President Trump has given a very strong directive, and that's going to be followed…a lot of documents.”

Correspondent: “Yeah. Okay. All right. So people can expect actual movement on this. It's not just empty promises?”

AG Pam Bondi: “Donald Trump doesn't make empty promises…I think promises made, promises kept, and that's why we're all there to carry out his directive about making America safe and prosperous.”

4) A prince, a president and a prime minister as suspects - why Giuffre may need witness protection

With the importance of any pending release of Epstein’s clients in mind, and with her previously reported criticism of the DOJ and FBI efforts to release names to date, Radical Media has speculated that perhaps the contradictions in Giuffre’s account of what has happened, and the contradictory police report into the incident, could be due to Giuffre planning to go into witness protection ahead of any ‘Epstein clients’ names being declassified, rather than being actually hurt.

Click to play:

Maajid Nawaz on WARRIOR CREED: “...So what could possibly be going on here? Having established the importance of Guiffrey as a living witness to the pending and promised release of the Epstein client list, and having established Guiffrey as a critic to date of the action of the Attorney General Pam Bondi in releasing information the public already had. It could well be that Guiffrey's statement on her Instagram page is true and that she has suffered a fatal car accident that remains that leaves her with only three days remaining to live, and has entered into renal failure, it could well be the case. It could also be the case - as these things happen, it's not unheard of - that Virginia Guiffrey is being placed into witness protection, and so that the inconsistency between what the police have reported and what Guiffrey have reported are explained by the fact that Guiffrey requires a cover story for disappearing because she's going into permanent witness protection in order to collaborate, cooperate with the law enforcement authorities in corroborating evidence against the remaining clients of Epstein, who are soon to be published by Attorney General Pan Bondi and have been promised by Congressional Overseer for Declassification Representative Anna Paulina Luna, both Bondi and Luna, Paulina-Luna pledging that they seek to fulfil the promise made by President Trump to declassify all this information.”

Certainly, why Giuffre could need such witness protection is not hard to fathom when considering who the potential clients of Epstein were: a prince, a president and a prime minister, at the very least.

The suspected president is known to be Bill Clinton.

Radical Media reports 3rd January 2024:

The New York Post reports 31st December 2023:

“Former President Bill Clinton will be identified as “John Doe 36” in a trove of court documents related to late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein which are expected to be released this week, according to a report.”

And the suspect prime minister is Israel’s Ehud Barak.

The Daily Mail reports 4th January 2024:

The Daily Mail reports 4th January 2024:

“The Jeffrey Epstein list of associates unsealed by a US judge has reignited suspicions the pedophile financier was an asset for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency. Israel's former prime minister Ehud Barak was identified in the bombshell dossiers Wednesday night. He served as PM from 1991 to 2001 after serving in the IDF for 35 years, rising to Chief of the General Staff.”

In addition to the prince, the president and the prime minister as suspects, there are many questions around a serving ambassador.

UK prime minister Kier Starmer has just appointed Tony Blair’s ‘prince of darkness’ Lord Peter Mandelson as his ambassador to Washington DC.

Radical Media reports 12th February 2025:

Yes, that is correct. The globalist Prime Minister of the United Kingdom has just appointed a man who visited Epstein’s Island, travelled to Paris with Epstein for his birthday after he was charged, and was due to visit Epstein’s New York City mansion while Epstein was in jail, as Britain’s ambassador to the United States of America.

Unfortunately for Mandelson, his relationship with Epstein is no longer one of mere speculation, or even journalistic investigative inquiry. It is a matter of confirmed court record.

US District Judge Loretta Preska accidentally unsealed the above photo of Mandelson on Epstein’s Island, only to then order the photo be resealed and stricken from the docket. But it was too late. Corporate media decided to republish the photo.

Mandelson’s name is easier to corroborate not only because it was unsealed by Judge Loretta Preska in this latest round, but Epstein’s ‘Little Black Book’ reportedly contains no less than ten separate contact entries for Mandelson:

Likewise, and as Radical Media reported last year, US spyware company Palantir founder Peter Thiel, who was Vice-President JD Vance’s main campaign donor and Elon Musk’s Paypal co-founder, is also implicated in the Epstein files, though to what extent remains unclear.

Radical Media reports 11th January 2024:

Founder of American spyware company Palantir, Mr Thiel is on record having had several meetings with Epstein. One of which was proceeded by a meeting between Bill Burns, the current director of the CIA, and Epstein.

The Daily Mail reports 30th May 2023:

“Tech billionaire and early Facebook investor Peter Thiel had several meetings with Epstein, the calendars show. During one stretch in 2014 Thiel appears to have met Epstein three times in quick succession at a time when he was on the board of Facebook and in charge of venture capital firm Founders Fund. He was also the chairman of analytics company Palantir, which works closely with the Department of Defense. The logs show that in September 2014, Epstein's schedule listed Thiel under 'people to see'. The two men met for dinner at Epstein's New York mansion on the 12th with Woody Allen present, the schedule says. The following day Epstein met Thiel on his own from 2pm to 4pm after which Bill Burns, the current director of the CIA who was deputy secretary of state at the time, joined them for an hour. The day after that, Epstein planned a lunch and said that 'maybe Peter Thiel' would come. The two men were scheduled for lunch the following week and the entry lists Thiel's personal assistant and their number. Thiel did not respond to DailyMail.com's request for comment.”

Consider the above documented meetings between Peter Thiel and Epstein, and now see the stance recently taken by Thiel’s spyware firm Palantir toward Israel’s ethnic cleansing in Gaza.

Under Peter Thiel, Palantir chose to stand by Netanyahu’s war crimes in Gaza while Thiel’s connection to Epstein is already public. This further strengthen’s our view above that the purposes of Epstein’s operation was to serve as a CIA/Mossad honeytrap coercing public figures to comply with certain foreign policy aims. The confirmation that former CIA head Bill Burns had also attending an Epstein meeting only strengthens such an assertion.

With such a powerful list of enemies, the reader could begin to understand why Virginia Giuffre’s life could be in danger.

As always, Radical Media advises corroborating any name suspected of being an Epstein client or collaborator, against a robust check list of Epstein related activity. Such corroboration would include, but not be restricted to matching:

i) Names mentioned by trial witnesses (searchable), with:

ii) Names in Epstein’s ‘Little Black Book’ (searchable), or his older black book from 1997 (searchable),

iii) The flight paths and flight logs (searchable) kept by Epstein’s private jet nicknamed ‘The Lolita Express’,

iv) Names mentioned in Epstein’s private calendar,

v) Evidence of having been on Epstein’s Island, and

vi) Evidence of having visited any of Epstein’s homes.

And as the Radical Dispatch has already determined, the entire Epstein operation was evidently a global CIA/Mossad honeytrap used for blackmail. A final corroboration would therefore be to identify:

vii) which of the names betray behaviour beholden to Netanyahu’s foreign policy objectives, by publicly advocating for war, the commission of war crimes, or any other crimes against humanity.

However, until the full Epstein Files are released and we are able to corroborate the names of suspects, leading to some successful prosecutions, Radical Media is forgiven for taking the dim view that if somehow, nobody is complicit, then everyone is complicit.

As we have been saying for a long while now, the world has only been made aware of the tip of the iceberg in this regard. But we are coming.

5) NBC Dateline’s ‘To Catch a Predator’ host Chris Hanson weighs in on Epstein Files

Radical Media’s recent interview with NBC Dateline’s ‘To Catch a Predator’ host Chris Hanson covered this Epstein topic extensively.

Our post-interview ‘behind the scenes’ chat with Hanson is republished below for readers as it relates to the Epstein Files.

Click to play:

Maajid Nawaz: “…welcome everybody uh this is a behind the scenes post interview chat with none other than the well-known to catch a predator host Chris Hansen is here right..”

Chris Hanson: “Hey guys, how are you we just had a great interview…”

Maajid Nawaz: “Well, thank you. I was saying to you just as you walked in, it's the one guy who I've sat opposite, looking as I was into your eyes. And I'd say the one guy that I think matches my intensity, and I'd say even passion for this subject. Chris, how was that for you? How did it go for you?”

Chris Hanson: “I think it was great. You know, I often find...that these conversations stretch you intellectually and make you think about what you do. And I think it's important for guys in our business to do that from time to time and to sit across the table from you for this very worthwhile project. It was my pleasure to be a part of it. Really, it was cool.”

Maajid Nawaz: “Well, look, I'm a long-time admirer. I'm obviously aware of your shows. As you could probably tell in my conversation with you, I share the passion on this subject and really do feel that you're doing worthwhile work. So thank you for joining us. Were there any moments that you felt were uncomfortable for you in that chat?”

Chris Hanson: “No, I think again, you know, if you see me slow down for a minute to think about something, it's just a matter of wanting to be thoughtful with an answer to a very thoughtful question. And I think, you know, all these things, they get you into the philosophical matter of what you do. And I think it's important to have these conversations because it makes me better at what I do when we go do it.”

Maajid Nawaz: “…were there any highlights that you felt like?”

Chris Hanson: “Well, I think it was interesting to explore the Epstein material because obviously we have been told by the attorney general here in this country that we have Epstein files that are going to be given to people like us to explore them and to perhaps answer some of these many questions that we have. So it allows me to go back and kind of think about the reporting I've done on the Epstein thing and think, you know, whether that was good or fell short or what more we should have done because obviously this is a huge story and it's not over yet, you know.”

Maajid Nawaz: “For our viewers, we spent a lot of time just as a bit of an advanced preview for you. We spent a lot of time, not just from Chris's background in the ‘Catch a Predator’ series and its history and how he feels it's relevant till today, but also the Epstein case itself. Chris's views on that. It's a really interesting conversation. Last thing for you, Chris, I did promise I wouldn't take too much of time. We've just been sat down for an hour off. Because what they may not know is you're also on the business end with ‘Tru Blue’ in helping us move this show forward. What, if anything, would you like to share with our viewers about the future of this show ‘Canceled’, your hopes for it, and where you think it'll end up?”

Chris Hanson: “Well, I think it's an incredible look at some of the things that have been considered canceled in our culture. One of them that we discussed was...you know, some of the crime reporting and embedding with law enforcement that, you know, for a little bit sort of fell off. And now we're back with it full force. And the beauty of ‘Tru Blue’ is not only do I get to explore the stories that take down with Chris Hansen, predator investigations, but to create these, very compelling documentaries that wouldn't take place anywhere else. And we get to do them here and team up with people like yourself to do them. So I think it's a great opportunity. It's going to be a great project. So I look forward to not only seeing it myself, but for you all there to see it.”

Maajid Nawaz: “Chris, thank you very much.”

Chris Hanson: “Thank you.”

Maajid Nawaz: “I did promise I wouldn't take too much attention. Thank you. I'm holding the phone with that hand. Oh, the blooper. Tell us about the blooper. Oh, the blooper.”

Chris Hanson: ”So at the end of the interview, you know, it says, you know, thank you very much. He extends his hand and my bracelet got caught on the button of my sport card and I was stuck there.”

Maajid Nawaz: “He couldn't extend his hand, which I think we're going to try and get the clip for that. All right. Thank you, buddy. Thank you very much.”

Chris Hanson: “My pleasure. Thank you.”

Maajid Nawaz: “Thank you, guys. And we'll see more updates soon. See you soon. All right. Bye-bye.”

This chat was conducted after a longer interview by us with Chris Hanson while in Cleveland, Ohio, filming our new show ‘Canceled’. Here is a 1-minute video tour of our new studio for ‘Canceled’ via Instagram and some photos of the stunning set design.

Our main guests and topics were as follows…

…become a premium member to gain access to see who else we interviewed for ‘Canceled’ and to access post-interview ‘behind the scenes’ chats with each guest.