This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.
At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 27th May 2025, with a transcript provided - UK Assisted Dying Bill Must Be Killed.
This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:
Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.
UK Assisted Dying Bill Must Be Killed
- A Radical Dispatch
1) State Assisted Suicide
Globalists in the UK are rushing to legalise state assisted suicide, euphemistically named the Assisted Dying Bill, without providing any time for scrutiny of the legislation.
The Times reports 26th May 2025:
“MPs are unable to properly debate the ’huge implications’ of the assisted dying bill because there is too little time for proper scrutiny, the justice secretary has warned. Shabana Mahmood, who opposes the legislation, raised concerns that the bill was being rushed through before a vote next month. Changes in the law to allow assisted dying are being brought through the Commons in a private members’ bill led by Kim Leadbeater, a Labour backbencher, rather than by the government which is remaining neutral on the issue. Critics say this means there is less time for scrutiny.”
The multiple and serious concerns - explored further below - around this culture shifting legislation are being deliberately sidelined through an abuse of the legislative process.
The Times reports 26th May 2025:
“Earlier this month MPs ran out of time to consider the vast majority of amendments put forward during a heated session. More than 100 were put forward but just two were considered by MPs. Some opponents of the bill are pushing for it to be put to a royal commission so that the potential consequences can be fully explored. Last week Mahmood told The Times:…’I do think that this process has shown the inadequacies of private members’ bills as a vehicle for such wide societal change..there are huge implications here and the debate that we’re having is curtailed, it is short. We saw that last Friday. I don’t think it’s the right thing to do.’ The last two votes on amendments to the bill were won with margins of 36 and 56, suggesting that those backing it retain the upper hand.”
So grave are the long term implications that the Royal College of Physicians joined the Royal College of Psychiatrists as both formally came out to oppose the legislation.
The Times reports 15th May 2025:
“…the (Royal College of Physicians) RCP has become the latest medical professional standards body to object to Leadbeater’s legislation after the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP) said that it did not do enough to protect those with mental disorders….Opponents of assisted dying will, however, press for other changes, including a requirement for private clinics to publish how much profit they make from providing assisted dying. They also want the assisted dying commissioner, who would oversee the system and has been dubbed an ‘unaccountable death tsar’, to have to report to the chief medical officer. There will also be an attempt to remove so-called ‘Henry VIII’ powers that would allow the health secretary to change the founding principles of the NHS to allow it to offer assisted dying.”
2) Profiting From Death
The allegation - exactly as happened during Covid - that state assisted suicide will be used by private interests to terminate human life for profit, are very real. And the money involved is considerable.
The Times reports 2nd May 2025:
“More than 7,500 terminally ill people a year could seek state support to end their life within a decade of the practice being legalised, the government estimates. Officials believe about 60 per cent of requests for assisted dying would be approved, equating to approximately 4,500 or 0.68 per cent of all deaths from 2039 onwards…Staff time costs ranged from £412,000 to £1.98 million in year one, to between £2.6 million and £11.5 million in year ten. Costs for training NHS staff would range from between £1.23 million and £11.5 million in the first year to between £1.53 million and £9.71 million a decade later. An initial education campaign to ensure health and social care staff are aware of the changes was priced at £550,000 to £850,000…Running the commissioner’s office would cost about £10 million a year. Each panel was estimated to cost £2,000 a day, totalling between £900,000 and £3.6 million annually. There would be some savings for the NHS, the impact assessment said. If assisted dying reduces all applicants’ life by one month, it would cut healthcare costs by £919,000-£4.21 million in year one, and £5.84 million-£25.6 million in year ten. There would also be up to £2.17 million saved in state pension payments in year one, rising to up to £18.3 million.”
The fact that there are such huge sums involved that could be cut from state budgets and reallocated to private and quasi-public bodies in the business of ending life, hints at why those sponsoring this legislation seek to ram it through without allowing for any scrutiny.
The Times reports 16th May 2025:
The next reading of the bill is - ironically - on Friday 13th June, and there is concern that none of the objections raised will be heard, these include ensuring that patients with mental health issues or illnesses such as anorexia are not allowed to simply slip through to be considered ‘terminally ill’.
The Times reports 16th May 2025:
Critics are concerned that the entire process is a stitch up, because while the Labour government is publicly claiming ‘neutrality’ it is simultaneously providing drafting assistance to the bill’s private sponsor Kim Leadbeater, who also enjoys support from the prime minister Keir Starmer personally.
The Times reports 16th May 2025:
3) Covid-Era Health Secretary Matt Hancock Backs Euthanasia
The same Covid-era globalists who insisted that we entrust our lives and deaths to the state during the fraudulent pandemic are expecting us to trust them again with state assisted death.
The fact that Covid-era Health Secretary Matt Hancock has backed the policy, after being responsible for the thousands of deaths of our elderly in care homes in a deliberate policy of state orchestrated involuntary euthanasia using Covid as cover, should worry everyone. This specific concern is now subject to a formal medical inquest at Southwark Coroner’s Court in London.
Radical Media reports 23rd April 2025:
With this in mind, what does your gut tell you about Covid-era Health Secretary Matt Hancock’s moral compass, as he now wades into campaigning for Euthanasia?
Mail Online reports 11th December 2022:
“Sources close to Mr Hancock told The Telegraph that he decided he supported assisted dying over the pandemic when a colleague who was terminally ill wished to end their own life. He previously had been against the practice, which is banned in the UK, but while he was serving in Boris Johnson's cabinet he ordered a review of evidence on assisted dying.”
Or the fact that he used the cover of lockdowns to kickstart his obsession with euthanasia, by allowing terminally ill patients an exemption to travel in order to terminate their own lives. Presumably he believed that the terminally ill do not somehow spread “Covid”.
BBC reports 5th November 2020:
“People travelling abroad for the purpose of assisted dying will not be breaking coronavirus travel rules, the health secretary has said. New lockdown rules in England place restrictions on leaving home without a reasonable excuse. But Matt Hancock told MPs that seeking an assisted death abroad counted as a reasonable excuse.”
The implication here is horrific.
The Daily Mail reports 12th July 2020:
“The number of prescriptions for a powerful sedative that can kill the frail doubled at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, raising fears it was used to control elderly residents in stretched care homes – or even to hasten their deaths. Official figures show out-of-hospital prescribing of the drug midazolam increased by more than 100 per cent in April compared to previous months.”
The Sun reports 12th Juy 2020:
“CARE homes have been accused of using powerful sedatives to make coronavirus victims die more quickly. Prescriptions for the drug midazolam rocketed during the height of the pandemic, with some claiming it has ‘turned end-of-life care into euthanasia’. Official figures show 38,352 out-of-hospital prescriptions for midazolam were issued in April - more than double the February figure. The monthly average for the past five years in England was about 15,000.”
Knowing this, and having read what you just have, ask yourselves why so many disabled people died during the 2020 spike in excess deaths falsely attributed to Covid.
The BBC reports 11th February 2021:
“Nearly six out of every 10 people who died with coronavirus in England last year were disabled, figures suggest. Some 30,296 of the 50,888 deaths between January and November were people with a disability, Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows. It also suggests the risk of death is three times greater for more severely disabled people.”
The allegations surrounding Matt Hancock’s use of Covid to place hundreds of elderly on involuntary end of life protocols have precedent.
Past deaths involving our elderly due to the direct policies of the state’s end of life protocols are currently subject to prolonged criminal investigation. The Gosport War Memorial Hospital is subject to exactly such a criminal investigation, involving hundreds of deaths.
Radical Media reports January 27th from Portsmouth News:
This all points to why our real focus should be on improving palliative care, and not prematurely terminating life in order to make a quick buck.
The Times reports 13th May 2025:
“Patchy and wasteful NHS end-of-life care must improve before assisted dying is legalised, experts have said, in response to fears that patients would not have a real choice...opponents of assisted dying set up a commission to investigate the state of palliative care services after concerns that patients would be driven to end their lives for lack of other options…Only about half of dying people have palliative care to improve symptoms and quality of life, despite estimates that up to nine in ten would benefit, and only a third of hospitals have out-of-hours specialist advice services…The NHS spends £6.3 billion a year on emergency hospital admissions for patients in the last year of life, and Richards said there was now good evidence that services such as 24-hour specialist advice lines, faster access to equipment and better hospice care would ‘actually save money’ by cutting this bill.”
4) Canada Outsources Death
The overwhelming concern is that this is all a money-making scheme in order to slash state budgets and privately profit from out-sourcing death, with Canada already demonstrating the crass consequences of assisted dying once implemented.
The Times reports 30th April 2025:
“Critics have pointed to the situation in countries such as Canada where conditions for which people can end their lives have expanded over time and now include non-terminal conditions. People suffering from mental health conditions are due to become eligible for assisted dying in Canada in 2027. MSPs said that there may be a risk in Scotland that if the bill became law, ‘human rights or other court challenges’ could result in ‘eligibility for assisted dying being extended over time’…Unlike similar proposals for England and Wales, which were backed by MPs in November and are now at committee stage, Scots would not have to be expected to die within 12 months to be eligible for an assisted death…The Scottish bill also proposes allowing terminally ill 16 and 17-year-olds to end their lives early, while south of the border it is proposed that the limit would be 18. McArthur has previously indicated that he would be willing to increase the limit to 18.”
Regular readers will have long ago noted Canada’s decent into Gilead. Considering the plot of Handmaid’s Tale, the irony is noted. Canada has already approved state subsidised death via its C7 Bill that enshrined Medically Assisted Dying (MAID) into Canadian law.
Former Canadian Leader of the Opposition, Pierre Poilievre previously asked one of Trudeau’s minister’s about the dangers of MAID.
Here is the Freudian slip he received in reply:
Click to play:
Poilievre: “After eight years of growing poverty and desperation, more and more Canadians are suffering with depression. Some of them are going to food banks asking for help ending their lives, not because they're sick but because life has become so miserable and they want to end their lives altogether. This government has suggested veterans should end their lives instead of getting help that they need, and now they've announced that a year from today, they will introduce measures to end the lives of people who are depressed. Will they recognise that we need to treat depression and give people hope for a better life, rather than ending their life?”
Canadian Minister for Mental Health: “Mr. Speaker, I think it is totally irresponsible for the leader of the opposition to misrepresent what this means. All of the assessors and providers for MAID are purposely trained to eliminate people that are suicidal…and so this is for…”
And yes, it is indeed likely that the minister meant to say ‘eliminate them from the MAID programme’ rather than imply that they seek to ‘eliminate’ suicidal people altogether. But when considering the below, the reasons for this Freudian slip very clearly present themselves.
The Independent reports 4th December 2022:
And if still in doubt.
The Radical Reaction reports in Section 4, 1st December 2022:
Canada is Surely Fallen
The Spectator reports 30th April 2022:
“…when the Canadian parliament enacted Bill C-7, a sweeping euthanasia law which repealed the ‘reasonably foreseeable’ requirement – and the requirement that the condition should be ‘terminal’. Now, as long as someone is suffering from an illness or disability which ‘cannot be relieved under conditions that you consider acceptable’, they can take advantage of what is now known euphemistically as ‘medical assistance in dying’ (MAID for short) for free.
Soon enough, Canadians from across the country discovered that although they would otherwise prefer to live, they were too poor to improve their conditions to a degree which was acceptable.”
Since then, this story has developed. Canadian clothes retailer Simons used suicide to market their products for profit.
Here is a for-profit advert marketing death…
Become a premium member to watch the Canadian advert, continue reading this Radical Dispatch, and to access other premium services on Radical Media.
Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
