Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz
WARRIOR CREED
Globalist New UK PM Sir Keir Starmer Demands a Bigger Reset After Kneeling Before Zod
0:00
-1:00:30

Paid episode

The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz

Globalist New UK PM Sir Keir Starmer Demands a Bigger Reset After Kneeling Before Zod

Plus WARRIOR CREED Podcast

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.

At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED analysis from Tuesday 9th July 2024, with a transcript provided - Globalist New UK PM Sir Keir Starmer Demands a Bigger Reset After Kneeling Before Zod.

The audio analysis is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:

Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.


Share

Globalist New UK PM Sir Keir Starmer Demands a Bigger Reset After Kneeling Before Zod

- A Radical Dispatch

1) Globalist Starmer feigns a national mandate in order to “reset” Britain

The new globalist UK Prime Minister and Labour Party Leader Sir Keir Starmer has been reported in British corporate media to have secured a landslide victory in elections held on 4th July 2024.

But this is not quite true.

In fact, this was not so much a Labour landslide win as it was an historic Conservative landslide defeat.

The Independent reports 8th July 2024:

The Conservative Party’s official account on X, formerly Twitter, has been deleted. The removal came on Monday, a few days after the Tories suffered a landslide defeat to Labour in the general election. Visitors to the page only saw an error message indicating that the account was no longer live. “Something went wrong,” read one of the messages. Conservative sources suggested that the deletion was an error on X’s behalf, and that it was working to restore the account.

Despite this, Starmer’s Labour must run with the idea that they ‘won by landslide’ and hold an unprecedented mandate from the British public. Without such an illusion it would be much harder for them to bring about the ‘great reset’ they so desire.

CNN reports 5th July 2024:

And desire a ‘reset’ they do. So much so that Starmer’s first speech as PM restated this aim.

Click to play:

UK PM Keir Starmer: “It's surely clear to everyone that our country needs a bigger reset.

Let there be no doubt that the new globalist Prime Minister for the UK, Sir Keir Starmer has fully kneeled before Zod.

Starmer makes no secret about this. In the below video collage he is seen openly stating that he prefers Davos - the city in which the yearly World Economic Forum conference is held - to the seat of the British parliament in Westminster.

Click to play:

Starmer: “Our country needs a bigger reset.

WEF Head Klaus Scwab: “We need a great reset”.

Broadcaster: “Let us just ask you quickly, you have to choose now between Davos or Westminster.

Starmer “Davos

Broadcaster: “Why?”

Starmer: “Because Westminster is too constrained, and you know it's closed, and we're not having meaning. Once you get out of Westminster whether it's Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see working with in the future. Westminster's just a tribal, shouting place.”

Host: “Are you surprised that your Prime Minister didn't show up to Davos?

Starmer: “Yes, I think our Prime Minister should have showed up at Davos. I absolutely do. One of the things that's been impressed on me since I've been here is the absence of the United Kingdom and that's why it's really important that I'm hearing that our Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves is here as a statement of intent that should there be a change of government, and I hope there will be, the United Kingdom will play its part on the global stage in a way I think it probably hasn't in recent years.

WEF Head Klaus Schwab: “What we are very proud of now is the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, so we penetrate the cabinets.

2) PM Starmer appoints other globalists to his cabinet

Starmer’s globalist aspirations for Britain can be seen too in the new appointments he has made. His new Foreign Secretary David Lammy wasted no time in wearing his identity politics on his sleeve while hinting at further military embroilment in Ukraine.

David Lammy’s globalist Bilderberg meeting credentials are clear.

As are his hints in the lead up to the Nato summit currently being held in Washington DC.

Click to play:

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy:

It is the honour of my life to stand before you as Foreign Secretary, a descendant of enslaved people, a black working class man from Tottenham, a community which has never produced a Foreign Secretary before. This speaks to what a modern multicultural Britain can be. Proudly internationalist, determined to deliver for working people and committed to building a better future for us all. Britain has enormous potential, but the world faces huge challenges. more countries engaged in conflict than at any time since World War II, rapidly changing technology and a climate emergency. The government will reconnect Britain for our security and our prosperity at home. What happens here in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office is essential. Diplomacy maters. We will begin with a reset with Europe, on the climate, and the global south and a gear shift when it comes to delivering on European security, global security and British growth. My story is a story of progress. Progress won by all those who fought for a better future. Together, let us fight for a better future once again. Change begins now.

Starmer went further. He rubbed salt into the wounds of the nation by appointing none other than the Chief Science Officer from the now almost universally acknowledged failure that was the Covid mandate era, Sir Patrick Vallance.

And incase you needed any reminder of the clown show at work, forgettable former Labour leader Ed Miliband is now responsible for the financial protection racket dubbed ‘Net Zero’.

Here he is trying to eat a bacon sandwich.

Good luck with that one.

Talking of ‘has beens’, former Labour PM and globalist warmonger Tony Blair has also waded in, not wasting any opportunity to once again indulge his obsession over centralising all our information.

The Times reports 9th July 2024:

..Blair will call on the new government to use emerging technologies to automate swaths of the public sector and allow the NHS to scour medical records to seek out those who need pre-emptive treatment

..Wes Streeting, the new health secretary, and Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister charged with overhauling government, both leading Blairites, will be among the star guests at the annual conference organised by the Tony Blair Institute (TBI).

The state is to access all our private health data in order to pre-emptively treat us? Is it really a good idea to trust those who locked down 70% of the planet over a glorified flu, while coercing us all into taking poisonous injections?

3) Globalist world leaders welcome PM Starmer

Among the leaders first to congratulate Starmer for his victory were his fellow globalists such as blackface addict PM Trudeau from Canada.

Joining him was globalist warmonger and Nazi collaborator Zelensky.

Biden himself was among those first on the phone to Starmer, as shared by the new Prime Minister himself, in a call that once again hints at what is to come for sending us all further into war with Russia.

Sky News reports 6th July 2024:

Click to play:

Operator: “This is the White House situation Room, to connect Prime Minister Starmer to President Biden. You are now connected to Air Force One.

PM Starmer: “Okay, thank you.

President Biden: “Mr. Prime Minister, congratulations. What a hell of a victory. Congratulations.

Starmer: “Thank you, Mr. President. It's been a long night and day. I've been busy appointing my cabinet during the course of this afternoon. So thank you very much for your congratulations. And fortuitously, we will see each other next week. I'm very much looking forward to seeing you in Washington (for the Nato summit) and having the opportunity, obviously, to sit down properly.

Biden: “I'm looking forward to it as well. There's no doubt in your leadership. Our two countries are gonna continue our special relationship. We’re working together on just about every issue: supporting Ukraine, managing the competition with China, advancing cooperation in the Indo-Pacific with AUKUS.

Starmer: “Firstly, the special relationship is obviously the bedrock, always has been, for our defence, for our security and prosperity which obviously is central to our missions for government.

Since this call PM Starmer has attended the Nato summit in Washington DC, where it was announced that British missiles will be used by Ukraine on Russian targets.

The American people needed to be shown what Biden was/is/was. The Brits need to be shown what this lot are.

Brace yourselves.

4) Labour’s win was the most marginal election victory since 1945

The ‘Labour won by landslide’ narrative is crucial to manufacturing consent for Starmer’s next moves in facilitating the globalist agenda for WWIII against Russia. Without this the British public would be hard pressed to simply go along with the globalist agenda that Starmer has planned.

But the nature of Labour’s marginal victories at constituency level has reignited the debate about electoral reform.

The truth is that - when considering the above points - Labour’s victory is not as large as it seems, and this Labour government might not last as long as it thinks it will.

The UK is in for a heck of a ride.

At 411 seats compared to the Conservatives at second place with a mere 121 seats, yes Labour’s parliamentary majority is huge. However, when looking on a constituency-by-constituency basis their electoral majority is razor thin. It is only due to the nature of our First Past the Post (FPTP) electoral system that razor thin majorities in each constituency translate into absolute majorities in terms of parliamentary seats.

But such razor thin majorities on a constituency level remain vulnerable to by-elections and protest votes during general elections. In some cases, such as new Health Secretary, the ardent Blairite Wes Streeting’s seat in Ilford North, his majority was - shockingly - only 500 votes.

Or here, by 18 votes.

And here by 15 votes.

The above are observational examples. Below is the quantitative case.

This was the most marginal general election since 1945. Even Starmer’s own vote share, in his own seat, was slashed by nearly half.

The most acute marginal losses in terms of votes for Labour came from Britain’s Muslims communities, which were until recently deemed the core of the Labour vote.

All of the independent wins against Labour were taken by Muslim candidates. This was the case except for Labour’s expelled former leader Jeremy Corbyn, who comfortably won his own seat campaigning on causes dear to British Muslim hearts.

Nowhere has British Muslim anger towards the Labour party been more evident than in British-Palestinian independent candidate Leanna Mohamad’s moral victory as she came within 500 votes of unseating globalist acolyte and Labour Health Secretary Wes Streeting MP.

Yet so desperate is corporatist media to push the ‘Labour landslide’ narrative that London’s Evening Standard has pretended on their charts that Leanne Mohamed doesn’t even exist.

Some journalists are beginning to notice the gaping holes in the Labour landslide narrative. Starmer was asked about this recently.

Click to play:

Journalist: “Prime Minister, you secured a significant landslide in the general election but in areas where there’s a high Muslim population, Labour either lost seats or had their vote share slashed. Do you accept that there’s a problem with the relationship between the Labour party and British Muslims at the moment?

PM Starmer: “Well the first thing I'd say is this, that very many people voted Labour in that general election who've never voted Labour before. So we now hold seats in parts of the country that have never had a Labour MP. So this is an incredibly strong mandate. Of course, wherever we weren't able to secure votes, I'm concerned about that. But this is a clear mandate for change, for renewal, for a different way of doing politics and a return of politics to service. The days of self-entitlement and self-interest are over. And I'm really pleased to put a strong team on the pitch to start our work and to be completing here in Wales my visits to Scotland, to Northern Ireland and Wales, which is about resetting their relationship.”

Journalist: But what about the issue with British Muslims? Trust has clearly broken down there. The election results show that. What are you going to do to try and rebuild it?

Starmer: “Well, we've got a strong mandate, of course, where we didn't secure the votes. We'll address that. But I don't think there's any disputing the strength of the mandate that we have and that it's a mandate for change, for renewal and for politics as public service.”

Contrary to PM Starmer’s filibustering, such a historic breakdown in trust among a core Labour voter-base will not be easy to fix, at all.

Thread:

It is not just Muslim voters that Starmer has lost. Here are some free speech campaigners angry at PM Starmer for having chosen to go after Julian Assange, while as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) he chose not to prosecute the deceased and infamous prolific pedophile Sir Jimmy Saville.

Click to play:

Protestors: “Your job is leader of the opposition. Why aren't you opposing the government? Why aren't you standing up for our Constitution? Why aren't you standing up for the Labour, for the working class man? Why have you betrayed us? Traitor!  F**** traitor! What about the working class? Is this a Labour Party or the party of the elite. Why have your party allowed our Magna Carta, our rights, our common law to be ignored? Why did you go after Julian Assange? Why did you go after a journalist, Mr. Starmer? Why did you go after Julian Assange? Mr. Starmer, why did you target a journalist? Traitor! Why did you go after Julian Assange?

Police: “Get back! Get back! Get back! Get back! Get back!

So desperate are corporate media to hide PM Starmer’s marginal victory that even the once notable Times of London has been reduced to commissioning middle-aged North London female columnists to write desperate but disgusting puff pieces in ode to his alleged aphrodisiac qualities.

The Times reports 9th July 2024:

This, about the man who failed to prosecute Britain’s most prolific and high profile VIP pedophile, Sir Jimmy Saville. Indeed, Starmer is currently advised by former Blair advisor Lord Peter Mandelson. Lord Mandelson remained a close confidant of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, even after Epstein’s convictions. PM Starmer knows all of this yet still didn’t end his formal relationship with Lord Mandelson.

Radical Media reports 3rd April 2024:

So much for #MeToo.

5) A landslide Tory loss, not a landslide Labour win

The above is why readers should remember that this was not so much a Labour landslide win, as it was a Conservative landslide loss.

In fact, the Tory party held onto the smallest number of seats its ever had since its inception.

So great was the Tory loss that none of their former Prime Ministers’ seats were held.

What really happened is that both parties in fact haemorrhaged votes at the last minute to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.

Reform came second place in 98 seats across the country, yet none of those second place votes add up to anything at all in terms of parliamentary representation. That’s a very large number of disenfranchised people.

Considering Farage had just five weeks notice to launch his campaign, to go from zero to third place in such a short space of time is something worth recognising.

As the below chart shows, the largest gain in votes was for Farage’s Reform Party at +14.3 points and 16.4% of the national vote share. This was a great deal more than the Liberal Democrats secured at only 11.2% with -0.6 points. Yet the Liberal Democrats secured 71 seats in Parliament while Reform only got 5 seats.

Something is clearly broken with our electoral system.

The below chart shows both the Tory and Labour vote drop off significantly at the end. This is mirrored by a Reform vote spike at that exact moment.

It is clear where the momentum for votes is headed nationally. And this is why Farage has promised that his party is also coming for Labour.

And why this election has made electoral reform a major concern not only for those on the left, but also for those on the right now too.

Click to sign the Electoral Reform Society’s petition for urgent electoral reform:

The new British Prime Minister is a Trilateral Commission serving, Davos loving, globalist front-man. His position at this time is a final piece in the ongoing and attempted ‘global palace coup’.

Be warned. So desperate are they to hold onto power that they would rather spark WWIII than relinquish it.

Maajid Nawaz: “They overplay their hand when they think they're winning. That's a very common trait for ideologues. And the reason, arrogance, the reason why that happens is right down to what happens when you believe in an ideology, in dogma. When you adopt a dogma, an ideology, with which you're seeking to change reality, yeah? So think, for example, communists who believe in dialectical materialism. That change only occurs when you encourage conflict through the Hegelian dialect, yeah? And you encourage that conflict, exploit that conflict, and the unease that comes, and then bring a solution. See, you're working to certain ideological dogma about what reality looks like through a lens of ideas you've adopted, this idealism that you have for the future. It's why most of those types of people usually become tyrants because they're blind to reality they're thinking just in terms of their dogma. There's a weak spot there, huge weakness, when dogma defines your behaviour, you're no longer looking at reality to define your behaviour. So you're going to be less pragmatic and more dogmatic because you're led by ideology and dogma. That leaves serious blind spots you end up not seeing reality for what it is, and that's why they overplay their hand because they're not looking to reality they're looking to their dream right they're ideal which is actually a nightmare. So there's one great thing that happened over Covid and that is they overplayed their hand and they exposed themselves to everybody here in this room (applause).

There's now very little doubt among people that have heard of the World Economic Forum that it's attempting to influence how we do government and politics in this country, even though Klaus Schwab isn’t British. Why do we have an unelected bureaucrat and a foreign one at that telling us how to live our lives in Britain. It doesn't make sense. But then you go further. Why do they all appear to be beholden to this unelected foreign bureaucrat? Why do they all appear to be doing this man's bidding? And when you start thinking of things in that way, you think, why can't they just say no? And start digging a bit more, you then realise what Epstein's Black Book was about. They can't say no. Because talk about Kompromat, compromising material and information, political blackmail, or you then get Epstein if you don't agree, suicided. It becomes, that's when you start realizing that this is a global palace coup.

Our mission is to bring you Radical Media for Radical truths that modern corporatist media seek to silence. We cannot do this without your support. Full members also receive WARRIOR CREED and other Resistance Radio content and special offers. Please upgrade your membership and become a paying, full monthly member here:

Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.